Attention is currently required from: laforge, osmith, pespin.
Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, osmith,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40267?usp=email
to look at the new patch set (#4).
The following approvals got outdated and were removed:
Code-Review+1 by laforge, Code-Review+1 by osmith
Change subject: cnlink: Cleanup talloc tree
......................................................................
cnlink: Cleanup talloc tree
Previous logic allocating structs was a big convoluted regarding order
of assignments, which then even required a taloc_steal.
Since recently the struct hnbgw_cnpool is a talloc context, and struct
hnbgw_cnlink are allocated as being part of a cnpool, so clean up the
talloc tree by having cnlink under cnpool.
Finally, put the cnlink_fsm and the cnlink counters under the hnbgw_cnlink
talloc context, where they belong.
Change-Id: I90c22f2a2932ede7103c66f2263e72ac2fdae497
---
M src/osmo-hnbgw/cnlink.c
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-hnbgw refs/changes/67/40267/4
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40267?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I90c22f2a2932ede7103c66f2263e72ac2fdae497
Gerrit-Change-Number: 40267
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40273?usp=email )
Change subject: context_map: Rename ps_rab(_ass) to denote it is a list
......................................................................
Patch Set 4: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40273?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6ac029e6a820a031a443dae8c83e44f6ae9fb5fa
Gerrit-Change-Number: 40273
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:41:17 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40269?usp=email )
Change subject: cnlink: Introduce stats group with connected state
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40269?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9c78c6b78b4ee8d6836df8d90c5c57103aa4d762
Gerrit-Change-Number: 40269
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:41:08 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Attention is currently required from: laforge.
pespin has posted comments on this change by pespin. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40270?usp=email )
Change subject: vty: Allow setting cnlink msc/sgsn name
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File src/osmo-hnbgw/cnlink.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40270/comment/d1a6cf02_ec3d013f?u… :
PS2, Line 237: osmo_fsm_inst_update_id_f_sanitize(cnlink->fi, '-', cnlink->name);
> in theory osmo_fsm_inst_update_id_f_sanitize could fail, more likely than the others below. […]
Yeah I thought about that while writing the patch.
I guess in this weird case we are fine assuming the logging may be wrong. Otherwise we'd need to somehow revert the new string being applied on other places before the failure, which may create quite a lot of complexity.
TBH I personally like this kind of APIs returning an return-code integer even if right now we don't return an error in the implementation.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/40270?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings?usp=email
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic557f20f40fec49ce2c83a73f6e5c8b027d57ef5
Gerrit-Change-Number: 40270
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 11:36:20 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>