lists.osmocom.org
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

gerrit-log

Thread Start a new thread
Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2026 -----
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
gerrit-log@lists.osmocom.org

June 2023

  • 1 participants
  • 2480 discussions
[S] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: cnpool prep: add SCCP_EV_USER_ABORT
by neels 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
Attention is currently required from: laforge. Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33128 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: cnpool prep: add SCCP_EV_USER_ABORT ...................................................................... cnpool prep: add SCCP_EV_USER_ABORT To ease patch review, I decided to submit this separately from the caller, which follows in subsequent patch I5479eded786ec26062d49403a8be12967f113cdb The new event will be dispatched when there are SCCP config changes pending, and the human user types 'apply sccp' on the telnet VTY. The aim is to disconnect all connections so we can create a new SCCP User. Related: SYS#6412 Change-Id: Idff8e09b5328c904b175e4d4df7d4044a34f4a20 --- M include/osmocom/hnbgw/context_map.h M src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map_sccp.c 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-hnbgw refs/changes/28/33128/2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33128 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Idff8e09b5328c904b175e4d4df7d4044a34f4a20 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33128 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
1 0
0 0
[L] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: cnpool: make NRI mappings VTY configurable
by neels 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
Attention is currently required from: neels. Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33130 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: cnpool: make NRI mappings VTY configurable ...................................................................... cnpool: make NRI mappings VTY configurable Implement only the VTY configuration part, applying NRI to select CN links follows in I66fba27cfbe6e2b27ee3443718846ecfbbd8a974. Use the osmo_nri_ranges API to manage each cnlink's NRI ranges by VTY configuration. Analogous to osmo-bsc MSC pooling: make NRI mappings VTY configurable 4099f1db504c401e3d7211d9761b034d62d15f7c I6c251f2744d7be26fc4ad74adefc96a6a3fe08b0 plus vty: fix doc: default value for 'nri bitlen' f15d236e3eee8e7cbdc184d401f33b062d1b1aac I8af840a4589f47eaca6bf10e37e0859f9ae53dfa Related: SYS#6412 Change-Id: Ifb87e01e5971962e5cfe5e127871af4a67806de1 --- M include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw.h M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw.c M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_cn.c M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_vty.c M tests/Makefile.am M tests/cnpool.vty A tests/nri_cfg.vty 7 files changed, 784 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-hnbgw refs/changes/30/33130/2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33130 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifb87e01e5971962e5cfe5e127871af4a67806de1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33130 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
1 0
0 0
[L] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: cnpool: extract Mobile Identity from RANAP payload
by neels 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
Attention is currently required from: neels. Hello Jenkins Builder, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33133 to look at the new patch set (#2). Change subject: cnpool: extract Mobile Identity from RANAP payload ...................................................................... cnpool: extract Mobile Identity from RANAP payload For InitialUE messages, decode the RANAP and NAS PDU to obtain the Mobile Identity. Store it in map->l3. A following patch will use this mobile identity to decide on which CN links to pick from the CN pools for this subscriber. Add the new information to LOG_MAP() as ubiquitous logging context. Related: SYS#6412 Change-Id: I373d665c9684b607207f68094188eab63209db51 --- M include/osmocom/hnbgw/context_map.h M include/osmocom/hnbgw/hnbgw.h M src/osmo-hnbgw/Makefile.am A src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_l3.c M src/osmo-hnbgw/hnbgw_rua.c 5 files changed, 353 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-hnbgw refs/changes/33/33133/2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33133 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I373d665c9684b607207f68094188eab63209db51 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33133 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
1 0
0 0
[S] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: cnpool prep: add SCCP_EV_USER_ABORT
by neels 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
Attention is currently required from: laforge. neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33128 ) Change subject: cnpool prep: add SCCP_EV_USER_ABORT ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map_sccp.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33128/comment/dfe21295_bb043603 PS1, Line 451: tx_sccp_rlsd > Like in previous review, I'd appreciate if we could rename this mis-nomed function https://osmocom.org/issues/6051 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33128 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Idff8e09b5328c904b175e4d4df7d4044a34f4a20 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33128 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:09:25 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
1 0
0 0
[M] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: immediately SCCP RLSD on HNB re-register
by neels 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915 ) Change subject: immediately SCCP RLSD on HNB re-register ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) File src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map_sccp.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915/comment/39f9c73b_45e8db6d PS1, Line 362: tx_sccp_df1(fi, ranap_msg); : tx_sccp_rlsd(fi); > I ack your point in things being more complex in various corner cases, but I'm poking the SCCP-SCOC […] https://osmocom.org/issues/6051 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4e78617ad39bb73fe92097c8a1a8069da6a7f6a1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 32915 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:08:42 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment
1 0
0 0
[S] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: coverity: fix type of local var
by pespin 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
Attention is currently required from: neels. pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33158 ) Change subject: coverity: fix type of local var ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) File src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33158/comment/d447288f_394edfed PS1, Line 99: if (new_scu_conn_id < 0) { iiuc, eg. now 0xffffaaaa (valid address) may be handled as a negative and fail here. IMHO it's much better keep using uint32_t and to explicitly look for 0xFFFFFFFF for failure. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33158 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2623c06c23691acb75f6ee6ff3a42ac7d10a4b1f Gerrit-Change-Number: 33158 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:05:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment
1 0
0 0
[L] Change in libosmo-gprs[master]: rlcmac: Implement UL TBF Countdown procedure
by pespin 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/33095 ) Change subject: rlcmac: Implement UL TBF Countdown procedure ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: This change is ready for review. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/33095 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmo-gprs Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If043c86a0c2b89d0ac0b8174de39fbcb22bed8cb Gerrit-Change-Number: 33095 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:03:40 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment
1 0
0 0
[S] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: coverity: fix type of local var
by neels 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
neels has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33158 ) Change subject: coverity: fix type of local var ...................................................................... coverity: fix type of local var osmo_sccp_instance_next_conn_id() may return negative on error, so use int instead of uint. Fixup for recent 548d3d2f6639b728710b9a1905087a189f47de78 'use new osmo_sccp_instance_next_conn_id()' Related: CID#316694 Change-Id: I2623c06c23691acb75f6ee6ff3a42ac7d10a4b1f --- M src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-hnbgw refs/changes/58/33158/1 diff --git a/src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c b/src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c index cdc526b..2af685e 100644 --- a/src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c +++ b/src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ bool is_ps) { struct hnbgw_context_map *map; - uint32_t new_scu_conn_id; + int new_scu_conn_id; struct hnbgw_cnlink *cnlink; struct hnbgw_sccp_user *hsu; -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/33158 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I2623c06c23691acb75f6ee6ff3a42ac7d10a4b1f Gerrit-Change-Number: 33158 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
1 0
0 0
[S] Change in osmo-pcu[master]: Use OSMO_UNLIKELY() in bts_rfn_to_fn()
by pespin 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33157 ) Change subject: Use OSMO_UNLIKELY() in bts_rfn_to_fn() ...................................................................... Use OSMO_UNLIKELY() in bts_rfn_to_fn() That case should only happen under really rare conditions, like receiving a RACH.ind before having received any DATA.ind. Change-Id: I4c71f3481764b501a4441bc735a87725884a3e75 --- M src/bts.cpp 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/src/bts.cpp b/src/bts.cpp index 5160fd5..44acbed 100644 --- a/src/bts.cpp +++ b/src/bts.cpp @@ -748,7 +748,7 @@ OSMO_ASSERT(rfn < RFN_MODULUS); m_cur_fn = bts_current_frame_number(bts); - if (m_cur_fn == FN_UNSET) { + if (OSMO_UNLIKELY(m_cur_fn == FN_UNSET)) { LOGP(DRLCMAC, LOGL_ERROR, "Unable to calculate full FN from RFN %u: Current FN not known!\n", rfn); return rfn; -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33157 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I4c71f3481764b501a4441bc735a87725884a3e75 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33157 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: merged
1 0
0 0
[M] Change in osmo-pcu[master]: Move call to bts_set_current_frame_number() earlier in the code path
by pespin 02 Jun '23

02 Jun '23
pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33154 ) Change subject: Move call to bts_set_current_frame_number() earlier in the code path ...................................................................... Move call to bts_set_current_frame_number() earlier in the code path The FN time counter is not really PDCH specific, but to the whole BTS, and all other calls t the bts_set_current_frame_number() are already laced in pcu_l1_if.cpp; move it there. Change-Id: If36f22a1067c904fa7fda87bed5062b6738f0dd1 --- M src/pcu_l1_if.cpp M src/pdch.cpp M tests/tbf/TbfTest.err 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) Approvals: Jenkins Builder: Verified fixeria: Looks good to me, approved diff --git a/src/pcu_l1_if.cpp b/src/pcu_l1_if.cpp index 3f881cf..0370aeb 100644 --- a/src/pcu_l1_if.cpp +++ b/src/pcu_l1_if.cpp @@ -341,6 +341,9 @@ { int rc; + /* First of all, update TDMA clock: */ + bts_set_current_frame_number(bts, fn); + if (!pdch->is_enabled()) { LOGPDCH(pdch, DL1IF, LOGL_INFO, "Received DATA.ind (PDTCH) on disabled TS\n"); return -EINVAL; diff --git a/src/pdch.cpp b/src/pdch.cpp index a8becca..b265d71 100644 --- a/src/pdch.cpp +++ b/src/pdch.cpp @@ -986,9 +986,6 @@ int gprs_rlcmac_pdch::rcv_block(uint8_t *data, uint8_t len, uint32_t fn, struct pcu_l1_meas *meas) { - /* First of all, update TDMA clock: */ - bts_set_current_frame_number(trx->bts, fn); - /* No successfully decoded UL block was received during this FN: */ if (len == 0) return 0; diff --git a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err index c21c196..ee2dc3a 100644 --- a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err +++ b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err @@ -2248,7 +2248,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -2359,7 +2358,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -2412,7 +2410,6 @@ TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} Scheduled DL Assignment polling on PACCH (FN=2654288, TS=7) DL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){SEND_ASS}: state_chg to WAIT_ACK PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Scheduling control message at RTS for TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} -Detected FN jump! 2654275 -> 2654288 (expected 2654279, delta 13) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654288 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ RX : Uplink Control Block +++++++++++++++++++++++++ PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654288 ------------------------- RX : Uplink Control Block ------------------------- TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} FN=2654288 Rx Packet Control Ack (reason=DL_ASS) @@ -2550,7 +2547,6 @@ PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Expiring FN=2654361 but previous FN=2654353 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Timeout for registered USF (FN=2654353): TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} N3101 3 => 4 (< MAX 10) -Detected FN jump! 2654361 -> 2654353 (expected 2654366, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=1, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654353 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-1:G:TLLI-0xf5667788){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-1:G:TLLI-0xf5667788){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=1 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -2678,7 +2674,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -2737,7 +2732,7 @@ Allocated a single block at SBFn=2654327 TRX=0 TS=7 Tx Immediate Assignment on AGCH: TRX=0 (ARFCN 0) TS=7 TA=7 TSC=0 TFI=-1 USF=7 Found first unallocated TRX=0 TFI=0 -Detected FN jump! 2654275 -> 2654327 (expected 2654279, delta 52) +Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654327 (expected 2654288, delta 44) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654327 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ RX : Uplink Control Block +++++++++++++++++++++++++ PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654327 ------------------------- RX : Uplink Control Block ------------------------- MS(IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344:TA-7:MSCLS-1-0:DL): + rcv_resource_request: now used by 2 (tbf,rcv_resource_request) @@ -2824,7 +2819,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){NEW} set ass. type PACCH [prev CCCH:0, PACCH:0] DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){NEW}: state_chg to ASSIGN TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN} Starting timer X2001 [assignment (PACCH)] with 2 sec. 0 microsec -Detected FN jump! 2654340 -> 2654331 (expected 2654344, delta 9) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654331 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -2905,7 +2899,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -2986,7 +2979,7 @@ UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G){NEW}: Received Event ASSIGN_ADD_CCCH TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G){NEW} set ass. type CCCH [prev CCCH:0, PACCH:0] UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G){NEW}: state_chg to FLOW -TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G){FLOW} starting timer T3141 [Contention resolution (UL-TBF, CCCH)] with 10 sec. 0 microsec, cur_fn=2654275 +TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G){FLOW} starting timer T3141 [Contention resolution (UL-TBF, CCCH)] with 10 sec. 0 microsec, cur_fn=2654283 MS(TA-220:MSCLS-0-0:UL): - bts_rcv_rach: now used by 1 (tbf) Modifying MS object, TLLI = 0xffffffff, TA 220 -> 7 Tx Immediate Assignment on AGCH: TRX=0 (ARFCN 0) TS=7 TA=7 TSC=0 TFI=0 USF=0 @@ -3096,7 +3089,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -3189,7 +3181,6 @@ TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} Scheduled DL Assignment polling on PACCH (FN=2654288, TS=7) DL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){SEND_ASS}: state_chg to WAIT_ACK PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Scheduling control message at RTS for TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} -Detected FN jump! 2654275 -> 2654288 (expected 2654279, delta 13) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654288 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ RX : Uplink Control Block +++++++++++++++++++++++++ PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654288 ------------------------- RX : Uplink Control Block ------------------------- TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:G:IMSI-0011223344:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} FN=2654288 Rx Packet Control Ack (reason=DL_ASS) @@ -4335,7 +4326,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -4454,7 +4444,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -5023,7 +5012,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-2): 0f 00 00 12 28 fe 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 00 -Detected FN jump! 112 -> 8 (expected 117, delta 104) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -5188,17 +5176,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=99, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=99, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 19, MCS-2): 0f c0 04 12 20 fe 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 00 -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 91 (expected 13, delta 83) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=91 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 91) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=91 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 91) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -5292,7 +5279,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-3): 0f 00 00 06 28 fe 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 00 -Detected FN jump! 91 -> 8 (expected 95, delta 83) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -5417,17 +5403,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=78, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=78, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 14, MCS-3): 0f 80 03 06 7c fe 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 56 56 56 56 00 -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 69 (expected 13, delta 61) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=69 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 69) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=69 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 69) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -5521,7 +5506,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-4): 0f 00 00 00 28 fe 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 00 -Detected FN jump! 69 -> 8 (expected 73, delta 61) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -5630,17 +5614,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=69, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=69, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 12, MCS-4): 0f 00 03 00 70 fe 03 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 00 -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 60 (expected 13, delta 52) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=60 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 60) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=60 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 60) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -5734,7 +5717,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-5): 0f 00 00 08 c5 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 60 -> 8 (expected 65, delta 52) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -5827,17 +5809,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=60, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=60, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 10, MCS-5): 0f 80 02 08 c4 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 52 (expected 13, delta 44) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=52 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 52) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=52 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 52) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -5931,7 +5912,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-6): 0f 00 00 00 c5 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 52 -> 8 (expected 56, delta 44) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -6000,17 +5980,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=47, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=47, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 7, MCS-6): 0f c0 01 00 e2 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 39 (expected 13, delta 31) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=39 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 39) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=39 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 39) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -6105,7 +6084,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-5): 0f 00 00 08 c5 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 39 -> 8 (expected 43, delta 31) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -6182,17 +6160,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=43, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=43, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 10, MCS-5): 0f 80 02 08 c4 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 34 (expected 13, delta 26) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=34 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 34) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=34 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 34) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -6288,7 +6265,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-8): 0f 00 00 00 60 50 fc 07 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac 40 f1 1f 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 b0 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 02 -Detected FN jump! 34 -> 8 (expected 39, delta 26) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -6355,17 +6331,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=39, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=39, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 8, MCS-8): 0f 00 02 00 60 20 fd 07 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac ac 80 f4 1f 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 b0 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 02 -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 30 (expected 13, delta 22) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=30 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 30) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=30 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 30) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -6460,7 +6435,6 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=17, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=17, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 0, MCS-6): 0f 00 00 00 c5 7f 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 c0 ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca ca 0a -Detected FN jump! 30 -> 8 (expected 34, delta 22) MS(TLLI-0xffeeddcc:TA-0:MSCLS-11-11:DL) appending 512 bytes to DL LLC queue PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Received RTS for PDCH: FN=8 block_nr=2 scheduling free USF for polling at FN=13 of TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) FN=8 Scheduling data message at RTS for DL TFI=0 prio=3 mcs_mode_restrict=EGPRS @@ -6517,17 +6491,16 @@ TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled DL Acknowledgement polling on PACCH (FN=34, TS=4) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Scheduled Ack/Nack polling on FN=34, TS=4 TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} msg block (BSN 6, MCS-9): 0f 80 01 02 00 05 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 04 80 f8 1f 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 b0 b2 b2 b2 02 -Detected FN jump! 8 -> 26 (expected 13, delta 18) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=26 but previous FN=13 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=13, reason=DL_ASS): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 26) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=13, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 0 => 1 (< MAX 8) DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: Received Event ASS_POLL_TIMEOUT TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET CONTROL ACK for PACKET DOWNLINK ASSIGNMENT: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| DL_ASS_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to SEND_ASS PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Expiring FN=26 but previous FN=17 is still reserved! PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Timeout for registered POLL (FN=17, reason=DL_ACK): TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} -TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 26) +TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} poll timeout for FN=17, TS=4 (curr FN 112) TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} Timeout for polling PACKET DOWNLINK ACK: |Assignment was on PACCH|No downlink ACK received yet| TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xffeeddcc){FLOW} N3105 1 => 2 (< MAX 8) DL_TBF(DL:TFI-0-0-0:E){FLOW}: Received Event DL_ACKNACK_MISS @@ -7625,7 +7598,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got CS-1 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=184 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -7847,7 +7819,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got MCS-4 RLC block: R=1, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=5, RSB=0, rc=385 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) @@ -8308,7 +8279,6 @@ UL_ASS_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){WAIT_ACK}: state_chg to NONE UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: Received Event ASSIGN_ACK_PACCH UL_TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){ASSIGN}: state_chg to FLOW -Detected FN jump! 2654283 -> 2654275 (expected 2654288, delta 8) PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Got MCS-4 RLC block: R=0, SI=0, TFI=0, CPS=0, RSB=0, rc=385 PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) FN=2654275 Rx UL DATA from unexpected TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} TBF(UL:TFI-0-0-0:E:TLLI-0xf1223344){FLOW} UL DATA TFI=0 received (V(Q)=0 .. V(R)=0) -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/33154 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: If36f22a1067c904fa7fda87bed5062b6738f0dd1 Gerrit-Change-Number: 33154 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: merged
1 0
0 0
  • ← Newer
  • 1
  • ...
  • 224
  • 225
  • 226
  • 227
  • 228
  • 229
  • 230
  • ...
  • 248
  • Older →

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.