November 2023 - gerrit-log - lists.osmocom.org

[M] Change in osmo-bts[master]: Add GSMTAP encapsulation of RLP frames in CSD NT mode
by fixeria 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: laforge, osmith. fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124?usp=email ) Change subject: Add GSMTAP encapsulation of RLP frames in CSD NT mode ...................................................................... Patch Set 6: Code-Review-1 (5 comments) File src/common/l1sap.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124/comment/596bb9af_6b338676 PS6, Line 1854: if (!inst || !trx->bts->gsmtap.rlp) We also need to check `if (lchan->csd_mode == LCHAN_CSD_M_NT)`, otherwise we would be emitting garbage RLP frames during transparent calls. I saw this check in an early revision of this patch, but somehow it's gone? https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124/comment/2382735b_2be5884e PS6, Line 1866: 2x Actually it's `4x36bit` for TCH/H2.4. Similarly to TCH/H4.8 carrying more data (per-block) than TCH/F4.8. * TCH/F2.4: `2 * 36` bits every 20 ms, so `2 * 36 * (1000 / 20) = 3600` => 3.6 kbps * TCH/H2.4: `4 * 36` bits every 40 ms, so `4 * 36 * (1000 / 40) = 3600` => 3.6 kbps https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124/comment/e05035e2_2a196cef PS6, Line 1867: 2x 290 bit IIRC, 290 is actually `8 * 36 + 2`. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124/comment/ae1a3861_11e2db86 PS6, Line 1867: TCH/H 14.4 TCH/F, not half-rate. https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124/comment/a31d677b_cf7187f9 PS6, Line 1879: } else { > FYI if you think the UNNECESSARY_ELSE check is not something we need to follow for the Osmocom codin […] I think it's fine to have it enabled in general. pylint is also enforcing the same rule for Python by default. The benefit of following this rule is reduced nesting. But I wish there was a way to say 'wontfix' for specific comments, rather than having to remove Jenkins and do CR+1 manually, or having to disable checks in the linter. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bts/+/35124?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-bts Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I6a258458822bcb3fe7290a9b9b3d104beecda219 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35124 Gerrit-PatchSet: 6 Gerrit-Owner: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:08:38 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[L] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control
by fixeria 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: laforge, osmith. fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email ) Change subject: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (1 comment) File src/core/soft_uart.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172/comment/175e3003_05fc6ccf PS2, Line 398: if (active) /* assert the given line */ > This might be just me, but I always associate assert with assert(), as in crash the program here if […] Hmm, I see your point. But this is the terminology used in mostly all documentation I read so far, for instance "The signal is asserted (logic '1') by raising the voltage of the pin from negative to positive". Let's see what the others think. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I26b93ce76f2f6b6fbf017f2684312007db3c6d48 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35172 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:29:24 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[S] Change in docker-playground[master]: ttcn3-pcu-test/sns: fix PCUIF version number (follow up patch)
by dexter 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

dexter has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/35159?usp=email ) Change subject: ttcn3-pcu-test/sns: fix PCUIF version number (follow up patch) ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: (1 comment) Patchset: PS1: > Suggestion: maybe we could agree on always having the latest PCUIF version configured in `osmo-ttcn3 […] That makes sense I think. Unfortunately we cannot just append the module parameter to the file, it has to go in the [MODULE_PARAMETERS] section. We may still have a placeholder like "#PCUIF_Types.mp_pcuif_version := XX" and replace it with sed. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/docker-playground/+/35159?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: docker-playground Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I1f94a0459e35d7b5632c81d7f7e2e60eb0d0229f Gerrit-Change-Number: 35159 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:22:16 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[L] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control
by fixeria 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: laforge, osmith. fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email ) Change subject: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control ...................................................................... Patch Set 3: (2 comments) File src/core/soft_uart.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172/comment/a3f2ac49_03a28e9a PS2, Line 403: if (cfg->status_change_cb != NULL) { > call osmo_soft_uart_set_status instead? Good idea, thanks! Done. File tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172/comment/d2d6c854_a9593009 PS2, Line 409: printf("expecting osmo_soft_uart_tx_ubits() to yeild nothing\n"); > yeild -> yield? same below a couple of times Done -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I26b93ce76f2f6b6fbf017f2684312007db3c6d48 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35172 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:22:07 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[L] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control
by fixeria 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge. Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, osmith, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email to look at the new patch set (#3). The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder Change subject: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control ...................................................................... soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control Change-Id: I26b93ce76f2f6b6fbf017f2684312007db3c6d48 Related: OS#4396 --- M include/osmocom/core/soft_uart.h M src/core/libosmocore.map M src/core/soft_uart.c M tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.c M tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.ok 5 files changed, 332 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/72/35172/3 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I26b93ce76f2f6b6fbf017f2684312007db3c6d48 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35172 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits()
by fixeria 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: laforge, osmith. Hello Jenkins Builder, laforge, osmith, I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171?usp=email to look at the new patch set (#3). The following approvals got outdated and were removed: Code-Review+1 by osmith, Verified+1 by Jenkins Builder Change subject: soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits() ...................................................................... soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits() Check it once rather than doing this in a loop. Return -EAGAIN if Rx or Tx is not enabled when calling osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits(). This [theoretically] improves performance by reducing the number of conditional statements in loops. In the Tx path, this also prevents calling the .tx_cb() when the transmitter is disabled, so that we don't loose the application data. Change-Id: I70f93b3655eb21c2323e451052c40cd305c016c8 Related: OS#4396 --- M src/core/soft_uart.c M tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.c 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/libosmocore refs/changes/71/35171/3 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I70f93b3655eb21c2323e451052c40cd305c016c8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35171 Gerrit-PatchSet: 3 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits()
by fixeria 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: laforge, osmith. fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171?usp=email ) Change subject: soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits() ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) File tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171/comment/a709fb22_cf7965ac PS2, Line 268: receicer > receiver Done -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I70f93b3655eb21c2323e451052c40cd305c016c8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35171 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 09:17:51 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[L] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control
by osmith 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge. osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email ) Change subject: soft_uart: implement modem status lines and flow control ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (3 comments) File src/core/soft_uart.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172/comment/2af2c744_ca5f6d25 PS2, Line 398: if (active) /* assert the given line */ This might be just me, but I always associate assert with assert(), as in crash the program here if the condition is not met. Maybe consider changing the wording here? (also "de-asserted" above) https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172/comment/50b33c0c_671eb795 PS2, Line 403: if (cfg->status_change_cb != NULL) { call osmo_soft_uart_set_status instead? File tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172/comment/2fc0ccab_7e234a21 PS2, Line 409: printf("expecting osmo_soft_uart_tx_ubits() to yeild nothing\n"); yeild -> yield? same below a couple of times -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35172?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I26b93ce76f2f6b6fbf017f2684312007db3c6d48 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35172 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:56:21 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits()
by osmith 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: fixeria, laforge. osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171?usp=email ) Change subject: soft_uart: check Rx/Tx state once in osmo_soft_uart_{rx,tx}_ubits() ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1 (1 comment) File tests/soft_uart/soft_uart_test.c: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171/comment/f5ae536c_d8878df4 PS2, Line 268: receicer receiver -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35171?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I70f93b3655eb21c2323e451052c40cd305c016c8 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35171 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:42:14 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0

[S] Change in libosmocore[master]: soft_uart: fix doxygen doc for osmo_soft_uart_tx_ubits()
by osmith 30 Nov '23

30 Nov '23

Attention is currently required from: fixeria. osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35170?usp=email ) Change subject: soft_uart: fix doxygen doc for osmo_soft_uart_tx_ubits() ...................................................................... Patch Set 1: Code-Review+2 -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35170?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I648db45bbde39c6b3d839c744a56d01a562e4129 Gerrit-Change-Number: 35170 Gerrit-PatchSet: 1 Gerrit-Owner: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 08:40:02 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: No Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes Gerrit-MessageType: comment

1 0