pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29065 )
Change subject: port_number.adoc: Add default osmux port
......................................................................
port_number.adoc: Add default osmux port
This has been the port used historically in most existing deployments,
and it's the one already documented in the osmux section of user
manuals.
Change-Id: I9593e484a0df7cbfc3fa68f071246e3fb714bd4c
---
M common/chapters/port_numbers.adoc
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 0 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-gsm-manuals refs/changes/65/29065/1
diff --git a/common/chapters/port_numbers.adoc b/common/chapters/port_numbers.adoc
index c86551d..a3198f7 100644
--- a/common/chapters/port_numbers.adoc
+++ b/common/chapters/port_numbers.adoc
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
[options="header",cols="10%,10%,40%,40%"]
|===============
|L4 Protocol|Port Number|Purpose|Software
+|UDP|1984|Osmux|osmo-mgw, osmo-bts
|UDP|2427|MGCP GW|osmo-bsc_mgcp, osmo-mgw
|TCP|2775|SMPP (SMS interface for external programs)|osmo-nitb
|TCP|3002|A-bis/IP OML|osmo-bts, osmo-bsc, osmo-nitb
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-gsm-manuals/+/29065
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-gsm-manuals
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9593e484a0df7cbfc3fa68f071246e3fb714bd4c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29065
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
Attention is currently required from: msuraev.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28994 )
Change subject: Add function to guess AF_UNSPEC address
......................................................................
Patch Set 5:
(1 comment)
File src/sockaddr_str.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28994/comment/4edd5ff9_dc653890
PS5, Line 207: rc = osmo_sockaddr_str_from_in6_addr(tmp, &src6->sin6_addr, osmo_ntohs(src6->sin6_port));
This function is useless and should be removed imho. How can one guess the type here? osmo_sockaddr_str_from_in6_addr() will just always return 0 and AF_INET6 will be returned with whatever the struct was filled in (or uninitialized).
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28994
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1c90c56ce832f53b65e0d18d3cea94621c02a69a
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28994
Gerrit-PatchSet: 5
Gerrit-Owner: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:57:44 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: msuraev, dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28995 )
Change subject: Make osmo_sockaddr_str_from_sockaddr() less picky
......................................................................
Patch Set 7: Code-Review-2
(1 comment)
File src/sockaddr_str.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28995/comment/e33a20a3_838eba20
PS7, Line 389: guess = (src->ss_family == AF_UNSPEC) ? osmo_sockaddr_guess_unspec((const struct sockaddr *)src) : src->ss_family;
This all looks wrong to me, or I'm missing soemthing.
So you have a sockaddr_storage, which has size enough to contain whatever. Let's say it has ss_family=AF_UNSPEC; so you call osmo_sockaddr_guess_unspec() on it.
Then, osmo_sockaddr_guess_unspec() calls osmo_sockaddr_str_from_in6_addr() on it, which should convert fine no matter the random contents in the struct, since any possible value is acceptable in there.
So you end up handling AD_UNSPEC as AF_INET6, printing random stuff which may not be correct.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28995
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I36f20701663c3c7eae7fedc6551da44800b325bf
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28995
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:50:31 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: msuraev.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28993 )
Change subject: Use osmo_sockaddr_strs_to_str() for multiaddr helper
......................................................................
Patch Set 7: Code-Review-1
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS7:
I'm sorry but I see more drawbacks than benefits here. Heap allocation + converting a string addr to a sockaddr and back to a string. Amount of lines still more or less the same. This doesn't look good to me. If others like this then they will provide enough votes.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/28993
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Icef53fe4b6e51563d97a1bc48001d67679b3b6e9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 28993
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:45:11 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment