Attention is currently required from: pespin.
laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30564 )
Change subject: Move control_ts explicit checks out of the scheduler implementation
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30564
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifaf7dde651d56942779d84aa9135fc8c974b6f26
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30564
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 18:11:55 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, lynxis lazus, dexter.
neels has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704 )
Change subject: abis_rsl: when doing packet access, log t1,t3,t2 and fn
......................................................................
Patch Set 7:
(2 comments)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704/comment/66076f67_e4989521
PS7, Line 9: the
.
File src/osmo-bsc/abis_rsl.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704/comment/e011c545_c8a983bd
PS7, Line 1822: LOG_BTS(rqd->bts, DRSL, LOGL_INFO, "CHAN RQD: fn(t1=%u,t3=%u,t2=%u) = %u\n", t1, t3, t2, fn);
re: why not in the order t1, t2, t3?
you hint at a comment, i assume you mean this one:
"
The order T1, T2, T3 is intentional. That is the order in which the numbers are stored and also the order in which wireshark will display the values. When debuging it is easier when one does not have to convert between different display variants.
The fn is displayed at later log lines as well, no need to display it here once more. (it is important to see T1, T2, T3 since wireshark won't always do the conversion.)
"
The confusion is not gone, your comment says 1,2,3 while the code says 1,3,2. Is wireshark showing 1,3,2?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29704
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I83d20ba9e0ce6488d458ccf4a85c8445c30e3a89
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29704
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-CC: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:29:10 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30571 )
Change subject: tbf_ul: Fix wrong struct type in field
......................................................................
tbf_ul: Fix wrong struct type in field
This typo was harmless so far because both old and new structures have
the exact same content.
Change-Id: If2e20128a589a25b9dc3fd08340cdb92aad158c3
---
M src/tbf_ul.h
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/71/30571/1
diff --git a/src/tbf_ul.h b/src/tbf_ul.h
index 38784f8..c5c55f7 100644
--- a/src/tbf_ul.h
+++ b/src/tbf_ul.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
struct rate_ctr_group *m_ul_egprs_ctrs;
struct tbf_ul_fsm_ctx state_fsm;
- struct tbf_ul_ass_fsm_ctx ul_ack_fsm;
+ struct tbf_ul_ack_fsm_ctx ul_ack_fsm;
protected:
void maybe_schedule_uplink_acknack(const gprs_rlc_data_info *rlc, bool countdown_finished);
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30571
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If2e20128a589a25b9dc3fd08340cdb92aad158c3
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30571
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange
pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30573 )
Change subject: bts: Adapt slot_mask to trx defined array size
......................................................................
bts: Adapt slot_mask to trx defined array size
struct gprs_rlcmac_bts still hardcodes it to 8, but using ARRAY_SIZE
there should aim at seeing the relation between those, and avoid having
one updated without the other.
Related: OS#5827
Change-Id: I165588ba10d8528a9a496175d8dfe9d902c89e55
---
M src/bts.cpp
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/73/30573/1
diff --git a/src/bts.cpp b/src/bts.cpp
index 5ae0714..06ac5a7 100644
--- a/src/bts.cpp
+++ b/src/bts.cpp
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@
struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *tbf;
struct llist_head *tmp;
const struct osmo_mobile_identity *mi;
- uint8_t slot_mask[8];
+ uint8_t slot_mask[ARRAY_SIZE(bts->trx)];
int8_t first_ts; /* must be signed */
/* First, build the MI used to page on PDCH from available subscriber info: */
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/30573
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I165588ba10d8528a9a496175d8dfe9d902c89e55
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30573
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange