Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844 )
Change subject: gprs_ms: Move creating string name of object to a function
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8ab713154c8f308878f3e85b6f7e8afc5c4be249
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29844
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:53:37 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29839 )
Change subject: Call ms_store->get_ms() with GSM_RESERVED_TMSI instead of 0
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29839
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I364d238ff8a82abb14281140fe18b273c0e8f541
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29839
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:51:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: osmith, neels.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29836 )
Change subject: gsm48_parse_meas_rep: fix parsing multi-band list
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(3 comments)
File src/osmo-bsc/gsm_04_08_rr.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29836/comment/73ce17d1_5486ea88
PS2, Line 770: TS 04.08
FYI: TS 44.018 is a more recent version of TS 04.08
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29836/comment/a20a3696_a6a84c41
PS2, Line 775: struct bitvec *nbv
const
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29836/comment/1d1cfdb7_468063cb
PS2, Line 780: arfcn = 0
"In each BCCH channel sub list the absolute RF channel numbers are placed in increasing order of ARFCN, except that ARFCN 0, if included in the set, is put in the last position in the sub list" -- do we handle ARFCN 0 as described?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29836
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic5e4f0531e08685460948b102367825588d839ba
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29836
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:40:04 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
neels has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29815 )
Change subject: gscon_pre_term: properly clear mgw ep
......................................................................
gscon_pre_term: properly clear mgw ep
Commit 53b23c252e54688b66036d4183bfe6cb267ef48d introduced a weird line
duplication that instead should have been the way this patch does it.
Change-Id: I5a9a983bb6135059ec01edf054ea3f7165bb6a6f
---
M src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Approvals:
fixeria: Looks good to me, approved
pespin: Looks good to me, but someone else must approve
Jenkins Builder: Verified
diff --git a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
index 30a7eae..baa54e0 100644
--- a/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
+++ b/src/osmo-bsc/bsc_subscr_conn_fsm.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@
osmo_mgcpc_ep_clear(conn->user_plane.mgw_endpoint);
conn->user_plane.mgw_endpoint = NULL;
- conn->user_plane.mgw_endpoint = NULL;
+ conn->user_plane.mgw_endpoint_ci_msc = NULL;
if (conn->ho.fi)
osmo_fsm_inst_dispatch(conn->ho.fi, HO_EV_CONN_RELEASING, NULL);
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/29815
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I5a9a983bb6135059ec01edf054ea3f7165bb6a6f
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29815
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
pespin has uploaded a new patch set (#2). ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844 )
Change subject: gprs_ms: Move creating string name of object to a function
......................................................................
gprs_ms: Move creating string name of object to a function
This way it can be used outside of LOGPMS().
Change-Id: I8ab713154c8f308878f3e85b6f7e8afc5c4be249
---
M src/gprs_ms.c
M src/gprs_ms.h
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/44/29844/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8ab713154c8f308878f3e85b6f7e8afc5c4be249
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29844
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Jenkins Builder has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844 )
Change subject: gprs_ms: Move creatign string name of object to a function
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
File src/gprs_ms.c:
Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-366):
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844/comment/36987b9a_d3dda706
PS1, Line 957: ms_ul_tbf(ms) ? " UL": "",
spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-366):
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844/comment/57b0ed94_f1935cc7
PS1, Line 958: ms_dl_tbf(ms) ? " DL": "");
spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29844
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I8ab713154c8f308878f3e85b6f7e8afc5c4be249
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29844
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:08:02 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
pespin has uploaded a new patch set (#2). ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29846 )
Change subject: Rework tbf::update_ms()
......................................................................
Rework tbf::update_ms()
That function was pretty confusing since it used a "enum
gprs_rlcmac_tbf_direction dir" param (whose type is expected to describe
the data direction of a TBF) to describe the direction of the the packet
which triggered its call.
The parameter was actually always called with "GPRS_RLCMAC_UL_TBF" which
in this case meant "uplink direction" which meant "TLLI was updated from
the MS, not the SGSN".
The DL direction was only used in unit tests, which can hence be simply
replaced by ms_confirm_tlli(), which this commit does.
So this update_ms() function was actually used in practive in osmo-pcu
to trigger update of TLLI and find duplicates only when an RLCMAC block
(control or data) was received from the MS. Therefore, this function is
renamed in this patch and moved to the gprs_ms class, since it really
does nothing with the TBF.
Related: OS#5700
Change-Id: I1b7c0fde15b9bb8a973068994dbe972285ad0aff
---
M src/gprs_ms.c
M src/gprs_ms.h
M src/gprs_ms_storage.cpp
M src/gprs_ms_storage.h
M src/pdch.cpp
M src/tbf.cpp
M src/tbf.h
M src/tbf_ul.cpp
M tests/alloc/AllocTest.cpp
M tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
10 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/46/29846/2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29846
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1b7c0fde15b9bb8a973068994dbe972285ad0aff
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29846
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-MessageType: newpatchset
Jenkins Builder has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29846 )
Change subject: Rework tbf::update_ms()
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File src/gprs_ms_storage.h:
Robot Comment from checkpatch (run ID jenkins-gerrit-lint-364):
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29846/comment/d00a522e_0d296e10
PS1, Line 53: #endif
adding a line without newline at end of file
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29846
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I1b7c0fde15b9bb8a973068994dbe972285ad0aff
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29846
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:06:13 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
pespin has uploaded this change for review. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29845 )
Change subject: Avoid loosing DL tbf from old_ms when rx premier UL data
......................................................................
Avoid loosing DL tbf from old_ms when rx premier UL data
Scenario:
MS has UL TBF to attach to the network in FINISHED state, PCU received DL data
to continue with registration and creates a DL TBF in ASSIGN state (through PCH).
At that point, the MS creates a new UL TBF through RACH request and PCU creates
it with a new MS object (because TLLI is not known at that time).
When first UL data is received, due to contention resolution the PCU earns the
TLLI and finds out it already has another older MS object with that TLLI, hence
a duplicate and a merge must be done.
During that merge of the 2 MS objects, the DL TBF in ASSIGN state was
being freed. Let's actually not free it since we'll need to tell that DL
TBF in this scenario that it should instead re-start assignment through
PACCH.
Otherwise the MS keeps trying to register but the PCU is never able to
establish a DL TBF because it keeps assigning it through PCH instead of
PACCH.
Related: OS#5700
Change-Id: I9a989af89f9469d7894b9e70a2ea01989b9dbb75
---
M src/gprs_ms.c
M src/tbf.cpp
M src/tbf_dl.cpp
M tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
M tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
git pull ssh://gerrit.osmocom.org:29418/osmo-pcu refs/changes/45/29845/1
diff --git a/src/gprs_ms.c b/src/gprs_ms.c
index 239824f..be5b867 100644
--- a/src/gprs_ms.c
+++ b/src/gprs_ms.c
@@ -383,9 +383,17 @@
ms->imsi[0] = '\0';
}
-static void ms_merge_old_ms(struct GprsMs *ms, struct GprsMs *old_ms)
+/* Merge 'old_ms' object into 'ms' object.
+ * 'old_ms' may be freed during the call to this function, don't use the pointer to it afterwards */
+void ms_merge_and_clear_ms(struct GprsMs *ms, struct GprsMs *old_ms)
{
+ char old_ms_name[128];
OSMO_ASSERT(old_ms != ms);
+ ms_ref(old_ms);
+
+ ms_name_buf(old_ms, old_ms_name, sizeof(old_ms_name));
+
+ LOGPMS(ms, DRLCMAC, LOGL_INFO, "Merge MS: %s\n", old_ms_name);
if (strlen(ms_imsi(ms)) == 0 && strlen(ms_imsi(old_ms)) != 0)
osmo_strlcpy(ms->imsi, ms_imsi(old_ms), sizeof(ms->imsi));
@@ -398,14 +406,14 @@
llc_queue_move_and_merge(&ms->llc_queue, &old_ms->llc_queue);
- ms_reset(old_ms);
-}
-
-void ms_merge_and_clear_ms(struct GprsMs *ms, struct GprsMs *old_ms)
-{
- OSMO_ASSERT(old_ms != ms);
-
- ms_ref(old_ms);
+ if (!ms_dl_tbf(ms) && ms_dl_tbf(old_ms)) {
+ struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *dl_tbf = (struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *)ms_dl_tbf(old_ms);
+ LOGPTBFDL(dl_tbf, LOGL_NOTICE,
+ "Merge MS: Move DL TBF: %s => %s\n",
+ old_ms_name, ms_name(ms));
+ /* Move the DL TBF to the new MS */
+ tbf_set_ms(dl_tbf, ms);
+ }
/* Clean up the old MS object */
/* TODO: Use timer? */
@@ -414,7 +422,7 @@
if (ms_dl_tbf(old_ms) && !tbf_timers_pending((struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *)ms_dl_tbf(old_ms), T_MAX))
tbf_free((struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *)ms_dl_tbf(old_ms));
- ms_merge_old_ms(ms, old_ms);
+ ms_reset(old_ms);
ms_unref(old_ms);
}
@@ -508,6 +516,7 @@
imsi, ms_tlli(old_ms));
ms_merge_and_clear_ms(ms, old_ms);
+ /* old_ms may no longer be available here */
}
diff --git a/src/tbf.cpp b/src/tbf.cpp
index cb5d9f3..cd273af 100644
--- a/src/tbf.cpp
+++ b/src/tbf.cpp
@@ -215,25 +215,25 @@
void gprs_rlcmac_tbf::update_ms(uint32_t tlli, enum gprs_rlcmac_tbf_direction dir)
{
+ GprsMs *old_ms = NULL;
+
if (tlli == GSM_RESERVED_TMSI)
return;
- /* TODO: When the TLLI does not match the ms, check if there is another
+ /* When the TLLI does not match the ms, check if there is another
* MS object that belongs to that TLLI and if yes make sure one of them
- * gets deleted. This is the same problem that can arise with
- * IMSI in dl_tbf_handle() so there should be a unified solution */
- if (!ms_check_tlli(ms(), tlli)) {
- GprsMs *old_ms;
-
+ * gets deleted. */
+ if (!ms_check_tlli(ms(), tlli))
old_ms = bts_ms_store(bts)->get_ms(tlli, GSM_RESERVED_TMSI, NULL);
- if (old_ms)
- ms_merge_and_clear_ms(ms(), old_ms);
- }
if (dir == GPRS_RLCMAC_UL_TBF)
ms_set_tlli(ms(), tlli);
else
ms_confirm_tlli(ms(), tlli);
+
+ if (old_ms)
+ ms_merge_and_clear_ms(ms(), old_ms);
+ /* old_ms may no longer be available here */
}
static void tbf_unlink_pdch(struct gprs_rlcmac_tbf *tbf)
diff --git a/src/tbf_dl.cpp b/src/tbf_dl.cpp
index 67ac573..e5fdf3e 100644
--- a/src/tbf_dl.cpp
+++ b/src/tbf_dl.cpp
@@ -302,20 +302,8 @@
LOGP(DTBF, LOGL_NOTICE,
"There is a new MS object for the same MS: (0x%08x, '%s') -> (0x%08x, '%s')\n",
ms_tlli(ms_old), ms_imsi(ms_old), ms_tlli(ms), ms_imsi(ms));
-
- ms_ref(ms_old);
-
- if (!ms_dl_tbf(ms) && ms_dl_tbf(ms_old)) {
- LOGP(DTBF, LOGL_NOTICE,
- "IMSI %s, old TBF %s: moving DL TBF to new MS object\n",
- imsi ? : "unknown", ms_dl_tbf(ms_old)->name());
- dl_tbf = ms_dl_tbf(ms_old);
- /* Move the DL TBF to the new MS */
- dl_tbf->set_ms(ms);
- }
ms_merge_and_clear_ms(ms, ms_old);
-
- ms_unref(ms_old);
+ /* old_ms may no longer be available here */
}
}
diff --git a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
index c18fa77..ff56e6f 100644
--- a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
+++ b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.cpp
@@ -2124,8 +2124,9 @@
OSMO_ASSERT(ms2 == ms);
OSMO_ASSERT(ms1 != ms);
- /* DL TBF should be removed */
- OSMO_ASSERT(!ms_dl_tbf(ms));
+ /* DL TBF should still be alive in assign state */
+ dl_tbf = ms_dl_tbf(ms);
+ OSMO_ASSERT(dl_tbf && tbf_state(dl_tbf) == TBF_ST_ASSIGN);
/* No queued packets should be lost */
OSMO_ASSERT(llc_queue_size(ms_llc_queue(ms)) == 2);
diff --git a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
index 0cb024b..ba57cc0 100644
--- a/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
+++ b/tests/tbf/TbfTest.err
@@ -617,6 +617,7 @@
Modifying MS object, TLLI = 0xf1000001, IMSI '001001000000001' -> '001001000000002'
Modifying MS object, TLLI = 0xf1000002, IMSI '' -> '001001000000002'
MS(TLLI=0xf1000002, IMSI=, TA=0, 45/0, DL) IMSI '001001000000002' was already assigned to another MS object: TLLI = 0xf1000001, that IMSI will be removed
+MS(TLLI=0xf1000002, IMSI=, TA=0, 45/0, DL) Merge MS: MS(TLLI=0xf1000001, IMSI=001001000000002, TA=0, 45/0, DL)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1000001 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW) free
PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=4) Detaching TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1000001 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW), 2 TBFs, USFs = 00, TFIs = 00000003.
MS(TLLI=0xf1000001, IMSI=001001000000002, TA=0, 45/0,) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1000001 DIR=DL STATE=FLOW)
@@ -2228,9 +2229,10 @@
TBF(TFI=1 TLLI=0xf5667788 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) No gaps in received block, last block: BSN=0 CV=15
Old MS: TLLI = 0xf1223344, TA = 7, IMSI = 0011223344, LLC = 0
There is a new MS object for the same MS: (0xf1223344, '0011223344') -> (0xf5667788, '')
-IMSI 0011223344, old TBF TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=FINISHED): moving DL TBF to new MS object
+MS(TLLI=0xf5667788, IMSI=, TA=7, 1/0, UL) Merge MS: MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL DL)
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=FINISHED) Merge MS: Move DL TBF: MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL DL) => MS(TLLI=0xf5667788, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL)
MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=FINISHED)
-MS(TLLI=0xf5667788, IMSI=, TA=7, 1/0, UL) Attaching DL TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf5667788 DIR=DL STATE=FINISHED)
+MS(TLLI=0xf5667788, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL) Attaching DL TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf5667788 DIR=DL STATE=FINISHED)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) free
PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Detaching TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW), 2 TBFs, USFs = 03, TFIs = 00000003.
MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0,) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW)
@@ -2572,17 +2574,14 @@
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffffffff DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) BSN 0 storing in window (0..63)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffffffff DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) data_length=20, data=f1 22 33 44 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xffffffff DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) Decoded premier TLLI=0xf1223344 of UL DATA TFI=0.
-TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) free
-PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) Detaching TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN), 1 TBFs, USFs = 01, TFIs = 00000001.
+Modifying MS object, UL TLLI: 0xffffffff -> 0xf1223344, not yet confirmed
+MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=, TA=7, 0/0, UL) Merge MS: MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, DL)
+Modifying MS object, TLLI = 0xf1223344, MS class 0 -> 1
+TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN) Merge MS: Move DL TBF: MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, DL) => MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL)
MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0,) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN)
-********** DL-TBF ends here **********
-TBF(DL-TFI_0){ASSIGN}: Deallocated
-UL_ASS_TBF(DL-TFI_0){NONE}: Deallocated
-DL_ASS_TBF(DL-TFI_0){NONE}: Deallocated
-Modifying MS object, TLLI = 0xffffffff, MS class 0 -> 1
+MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL) Attaching DL TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN)
MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0,) Clearing MS object
MS(TLLI=0xffffffff, IMSI=, TA=7, 1/0,) Destroying MS object
-Modifying MS object, UL TLLI: 0xffffffff -> 0xf1223344, not yet confirmed
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) Assembling frames: (len=20)
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) Frame 1 starts at offset 4, length=16, is_complete=1
TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FLOW) complete UL frame len=16
@@ -2597,8 +2596,9 @@
UL_ACK_TBF(UL-TFI_0){NONE}: Received Event SCHED_ACK
UL_ACK_TBF(UL-TFI_0){NONE}: state_chg to SCHED_UL_ACK
New MS: TLLI = 0xf1223344, TA = 7, IMSI = 0011223344, LLC = 2
-MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL) Destroying MS object
-MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0,) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FINISHED)
+MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, UL DL) Destroying MS object
+MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0, DL) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=UL STATE=FINISHED)
+MS(TLLI=0xf1223344, IMSI=0011223344, TA=7, 1/0,) Detaching TBF: TBF(TFI=0 TLLI=0xf1223344 DIR=DL STATE=ASSIGN)
=== end test_tbf_dl_flow_and_rach_single_phase ===
=== start test_tbf_dl_reuse ===
PDCH(bts=0,trx=0,ts=7) PDCH state: disabled => enabled
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/29845
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I9a989af89f9469d7894b9e70a2ea01989b9dbb75
Gerrit-Change-Number: 29845
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: newchange