I think if the latest libnl has some special requirements re: processor speed or RAM size versa previous versions, it could be at least announced here, or even better mentioned somewhere in documentation ;)
28.06.2013, 17:09, "Stephan Meier" stephan@timeba.se:
Normally you should see something in your kernel logs if you don't have enough ram available and if the kernel kills a process. But this is a topic not really related to this mailing list.
On 06/28/2013 03:01 PM, Alexander wrote:
Hmm, I used Pentium-IV 3,2 GHz with 512MB RAM, could it be not enough for compiling? Got the same errors on Pentium-III 600 MHz with 640MB RAM though. While previous versions of libnl compiled fine on the same machine.
28.06.2013, 15:32, "Stephan Meier" stephan@timeba.se:
Hi,
not really. Your errors seems more like a resource problem on your machine...
Cheers, Stephan On 06/28/2013 12:39 PM, Alexander wrote:
Hello,
I am compiling on Debian 6.0.5 using autoconf from the official repository (cannot check version now, but believe it is something like 2.6x too). I'll try your fix to see if it works for me. Did you get the similar 137 error before?
With best regards, Alexander
28.06.2013, 11:17, "Stephan Meier" stephan@timeba.se:
Hi,
which Version of autoconf are you using? With my proposed fix and autoconf 2.69 on ubuntu 12.10 libnl compiles fine.
Cheers, Stephan
On 06/27/2013 11:11 PM, Александр wrote:
Yeah, I also cannot compile libnl, getting double error: Killed autom4te: /usr/bin/m4 failed with exit status: 137 aclocal: /usr/bin/autom4te failed with exit status: 137 autoreconf: aclocal failed with exit status: 137
Tried to report this in several ways, still no success
26.06.2013, 22:41, "Stephan Meier" stephan@timeba.se: > On 06/26/2013 08:03 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:10:17PM +0200, Stephan Meier wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> after cloning libnl from git://dect.osmocom.org/git/libnl.git, I tried >>> to compile it. It breaks while trying to compile the "nl-pktloc-lookup" >>> binary. It seems to be caused by line 131 in src/Makefile.am (LDADD >>> statement that overwrites the linker flags set before). Removing this >>> line and thus using the "old" linker flags works. >>> >>> Is this the desired behavior or did anybody just forget to delete this line? >> Not sure, have you checked libnl upstream? I can merge with the latest >> version, but bugs unrelated to DECT should be fixed there first. >> >> Cheers, >> Patrick > The upstream Version builds fine, so it would be nice if you could do a > merge. Are there any plans to merge the DECT changes upstream? > > Cheers, > Stephan