[L] Change in osmo-mgw[master]: ASCI: Support conference briding with 1..n connections

Attention is currently required from: jolly, pespin. laforge has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/33548 ) Change subject: ASCI: Support conference briding with 1..n connections ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) Patchset: PS2: mh. but don't we have a per-endpoint list of connections? so we would only be "iterating" a linked list of two entries in the "most cases" scenario you described above? Do you really think that iterating a list with two entries (whcih is three dereferences of the next pointer) is significantly slower than the mechanism you're introducing? I'm somewhat doubtful we should have that level of complexity without knowing for sure that there's an actual performance issue to begin with. -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-mgw/+/33548 To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: osmo-mgw Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ic99a55ab5a3a6170e940403fadd52697e99f2f3a Gerrit-Change-Number: 33548 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-CC: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2023 11:41:19 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: jolly <andreas(a)eversberg.eu> Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment