laforge has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/34974?usp=email )
Change subject: allow (second) CS RAB Assignment Request without RTP info
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/34974/comment/d186709b_57f2c6f5
PS4, Line 19: Do not (yet?) supp
the "yet" is about modifying an active RAB
-- IIUC for handover that wouldn't be needed. […]
for intra-RNC: Yes I would
assume that is the normal case, but we're making assumptions here (that the RNC will
hide the internal RAN topology / IP addresses and present a fixed RTP endpoint towards the
CN). Likely but not guaranteed.
As for inter-RNC: Likewise, there could in theory be some different support in terms of
codecs/rates. Again, likely that it's not required in a usual case, but I'd say
there are potential cases and the specs allow for it, certainly.
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/34974?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-hnbgw
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I25bf19981cd75a87a7ceb3382dae1ec626ae475c
Gerrit-Change-Number: 34974
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 08:39:47 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment