Attention is currently required from: pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. (
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/33981 )
Change subject: rlcmac: Use enum gprs_rlcmac_radio_priority internally everywhere
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(2 comments)
File src/rlcmac/gre.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/33981/comment/81395015_3aadbc26
PS2, Line 226: ll_pdu_len, get_value_string(osmo_gprs_rlcmac_llc_sapi_names,
sapi), radio_prio + 1);
I wonder if it made sense to adjust the enum in types_private.h:
```
/* TS 44.060 Table Table 11.2.5. "Radio Priority" */
enum gprs_rlcmac_radio_priority {
GPRS_RLCMAC_RADIO_PRIORITY_1 = 0, /* Radio Priority 1 (Highest priority) */
GPRS_RLCMAC_RADIO_PRIORITY_2 = 1, /* Radio Priority 2 */
GPRS_RLCMAC_RADIO_PRIORITY_3 = 2, /* Radio Priority 3 */
GPRS_RLCMAC_RADIO_PRIORITY_4 = 3, /* Radio Priority 4 (Lower priority) */
};
```
to add GPRS_RLCMAC_RADIO_PRIORITY_INVALID = 0 and shift the rest. Then it wouldn't be
necessary to add the +1 here. What do you think about that?
File tests/rlcmac/rlcmac_prim_test.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/33981/comment/b951568f_6e6e67da
PS2, Line 991: 2
2 instead of 1 on purpose?
--
To view, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-gprs/+/33981
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmo-gprs
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: If2d1946522bc4a1c19d65acb23605f1a3f05ab45
Gerrit-Change-Number: 33981
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 07:45:02 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment