Attention is currently required from: fixeria, dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31649 )
Change subject: pcu_l1_if_phy: support multiple BTS (in theory)
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File src/pcu_l1_if.cpp:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31649/comment/ee3a59ec_7b710b15
PS3, Line 1143: if (llist_count(&the_pcu->bts_list) > 1)
what? do you want to count the BTS list and print every time a DATA_IND is received?
If at all do that during PCU_IF_MSG_INFO_IND only.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-pcu/+/31649
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-pcu
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I33518cbbe83f7f8c071afa5e995d30930099ba92
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31649
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 15:00:36 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: neels, fixeria.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31609 )
Change subject: simplify storage of bsc_msc_data->audio_support
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/bsc/bsc_msc_data.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31609/comment/39e5ec2d_84812a5b
PS3, Line 139: for all these aspects:
> oh no, here it is. […]
I really don't get it. If it's known that the maximum is 13 why use 16 here? This is confusing readers who may then try to understand why 16 is being used here.
If it's a teeny detail then just fix it?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31609
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I625cedc4bb040d649fd6e1794ba468f4c6ad6adc
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31609
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 13:56:03 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: laforge, dexter.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31618 )
Change subject: pcu_sock: handle multiple BTSs with one BSC co-located PCU (in theory)
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS4:
I don't see what changed here? In my mind I think we already resolved that if osmo-bsc has no limitation it shouldn't block it, but osmo-pcu should. So I'm not sure why I still see updates on this patch?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31618
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I0b42c2c130106f6ffca2dd08d079e1a7bda41f0b
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31618
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 13:48:43 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: arehbein.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31304 )
Change subject: Includes: Remove enum defs, instead include them
......................................................................
Patch Set 4:
(1 comment)
File include/osmocom/bsc/gsm_data.h:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31304/comment/61ce5f3b_e8d5d003
PS1, Line 654: enum gprs_cs {
> This enum pretty much already exists in `libosmocore/include/osmocom/gsm/protocol/gsm_44_060.h`. […]
IIUC the one under gsm_44_06.h is used to describe internal data structures / fields, while the other describes bits in a bitmask used in a field sent over a specific protocol (ipaccess Abis OML/RSL). So the purpose is different and hence the values of each one may be different. Can you check the use of those and see if I'm correct?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-bsc/+/31304
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-bsc
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2883aee12b501a717d5acecd5638882724336e72
Gerrit-Change-Number: 31304
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 13:44:10 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment