pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35233?usp=email )
Change subject: socket: osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr2(): Apply params too if no OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND flag set
......................................................................
socket: osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr2(): Apply params too if no OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND flag set
Those parameters are not related to binding and hence should be
applicable before binding. This allows a caller setting them while not
caring about explicit binding (OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND).
Until recently calling this function without OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND was not
really supported, so the previous placement setting these params in the
function didn't matter much. It does now.
Change-Id: Ia32510e8db1de0cc0dc36cebf8a94f09e44fda70
---
M src/core/socket.c
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
osmith: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/src/core/socket.c b/src/core/socket.c
index 0bc275b..7fc1b72 100644
--- a/src/core/socket.c
+++ b/src/core/socket.c
@@ -959,23 +959,8 @@
goto ret_freeaddrinfo;
}
- if (flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND) {
- /* Since so far we only allow IPPROTO_SCTP in this function,
- no need to check below for "proto != IPPROTO_UDP || flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_UDP_REUSEADDR" */
- rc = setsockopt(sfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR,
- &on, sizeof(on));
- if (rc < 0) {
- int err = errno;
- multiaddr_snprintf(strbuf, sizeof(strbuf), local_hosts, local_hosts_cnt);
- LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR,
- "cannot setsockopt socket:"
- " %s:%u: %s\n",
- strbuf, local_port,
- strerror(err));
- goto ret_close;
- }
-
- if (pars && pars->sctp.sockopt_auth_supported.set) {
+ if (pars) {
+ if (pars->sctp.sockopt_auth_supported.set) {
/* RFC 5061 4.2.7: ASCONF also requires AUTH feature. */
rc = setsockopt_sctp_auth_supported(sfd, pars->sctp.sockopt_auth_supported.value);
if (rc < 0) {
@@ -991,7 +976,7 @@
}
}
- if (pars && pars->sctp.sockopt_asconf_supported.set) {
+ if (pars->sctp.sockopt_asconf_supported.set) {
rc = setsockopt_sctp_asconf_supported(sfd, pars->sctp.sockopt_asconf_supported.value);
if (rc < 0) {
int err = errno;
@@ -1006,7 +991,7 @@
}
}
- if (pars && pars->sctp.sockopt_initmsg.set) {
+ if (pars->sctp.sockopt_initmsg.set) {
rc = setsockopt_sctp_initmsg(sfd, pars);
if (rc < 0) {
int err = errno;
@@ -1019,6 +1004,23 @@
/* do not fail, some parameters will be left as the global default */
}
}
+ }
+
+ if (flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND) {
+ /* Since so far we only allow IPPROTO_SCTP in this function,
+ no need to check below for "proto != IPPROTO_UDP || flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_UDP_REUSEADDR" */
+ rc = setsockopt(sfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR,
+ &on, sizeof(on));
+ if (rc < 0) {
+ int err = errno;
+ multiaddr_snprintf(strbuf, sizeof(strbuf), local_hosts, local_hosts_cnt);
+ LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR,
+ "cannot setsockopt socket:"
+ " %s:%u: %s\n",
+ strbuf, local_port,
+ strerror(err));
+ goto ret_close;
+ }
/* Build array of addresses taking first entry for each host.
TODO: Ideally we should use backtracking storing last used
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35233?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia32510e8db1de0cc0dc36cebf8a94f09e44fda70
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35233
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
pespin has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35232?usp=email )
Change subject: socket: Reimplement osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr()
......................................................................
socket: Reimplement osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr()
This is an attempt to fix several downsides of current
osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr() API, mainly the requirement to pass an explicit
local address (!NULL). It also now works fine if OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND flag
is not used.
This reimplementation is based on the follwing logic:
- If caller passed family=AF_INET or family=AF_INET6, that same family
is used and kernel will fail if something is wrong.
- If caller passes family=AF_UNSPEC, the function will try to find the
required family to create the socket. The decision is taken on the
assumption that an AF_INET6 socket can handle both AF_INET6 and AF_INET
addresses (through v4v6 mapping). Hence, if any of the addresses in the
local or remote set of addresses resolves through getaddrinfo() to an
IPv6 address, then AF_INET6 is used; AF_INET is used otherwise.
Related: OS#6279
Change-Id: I2641fbaca6f477404b094dbc53c0c1a3dd3fd2fd
---
M src/core/socket.c
1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Approvals:
Jenkins Builder: Verified
osmith: Looks good to me, approved
diff --git a/src/core/socket.c b/src/core/socket.c
index 1dc8e46..0bc275b 100644
--- a/src/core/socket.c
+++ b/src/core/socket.c
@@ -616,18 +616,45 @@
#ifdef HAVE_LIBSCTP
-/* Check whether there's an IPv6 Addr as first option of any addrinfo item in the addrinfo set */
+/* Check whether there's an addrinfo item in the addrinfo set with an IPv4 or IPv6 option */
static void addrinfo_has_v4v6addr(const struct addrinfo **result, size_t result_count, bool *has_v4, bool *has_v6)
{
size_t host_idx;
+ const struct addrinfo *rp;
*has_v4 = false;
*has_v6 = false;
for (host_idx = 0; host_idx < result_count; host_idx++) {
- if (result[host_idx]->ai_family == AF_INET)
- *has_v4 = true;
- else if (result[host_idx]->ai_family == AF_INET6)
- *has_v6 = true;
+ for (rp = result[host_idx]; rp != NULL; rp = rp->ai_next) {
+ if (result[host_idx]->ai_family == AF_INET)
+ *has_v4 = true;
+ else if (result[host_idx]->ai_family == AF_INET6)
+ *has_v6 = true;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* Check whether there's an addrinfo item in the addrinfo set with only an IPv4 or IPv6 option */
+static void addrinfo_has_v4v6only_addr(const struct addrinfo **result, size_t result_count, bool *has_v4only, bool *has_v6only)
+{
+ size_t host_idx;
+ const struct addrinfo *rp;
+ *has_v4only = false;
+ *has_v6only = false;
+
+ for (host_idx = 0; host_idx < result_count; host_idx++) {
+ bool has_v4 = false;
+ bool has_v6 = false;
+ for (rp = result[host_idx]; rp != NULL; rp = rp->ai_next) {
+ if (rp->ai_family == AF_INET6)
+ has_v6 = true;
+ else
+ has_v4 = true;
+ }
+ if (has_v4 && !has_v6)
+ *has_v4only = true;
+ else if (has_v6 && !has_v4)
+ *has_v6only = true;
}
}
@@ -636,13 +663,16 @@
{
size_t host_idx;
struct in6_addr in6addr_any = IN6ADDR_ANY_INIT;
+ const struct addrinfo *rp;
for (host_idx = 0; host_idx < result_count; host_idx++) {
- if (result[host_idx]->ai_family != AF_INET6)
- continue;
- if (memcmp(&((struct sockaddr_in6 *)result[host_idx]->ai_addr)->sin6_addr,
- &in6addr_any, sizeof(in6addr_any)) == 0)
- return true;
+ for (rp = result[host_idx]; rp != NULL; rp = rp->ai_next) {
+ if (rp->ai_family != AF_INET6)
+ continue;
+ if (memcmp(&((struct sockaddr_in6 *)rp->ai_addr)->sin6_addr,
+ &in6addr_any, sizeof(in6addr_any)) == 0)
+ return true;
+ }
}
return false;
}
@@ -676,22 +706,28 @@
for (host_idx = 0; host_idx < host_cont; host_idx++) {
/* Addresses are ordered based on RFC 3484, see man getaddrinfo */
for (rp = result[host_idx]; rp != NULL; rp = rp->ai_next) {
- if (family != AF_UNSPEC && rp->ai_family != family)
- continue;
- if (offset + rp->ai_addrlen > addrs_buf_len) {
- LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "Output buffer to small: %zu\n",
- addrs_buf_len);
- return -ENOSPC;
+ if (family == AF_UNSPEC || rp->ai_family == family)
+ break;
+ }
+ if (!rp && family == AF_INET6) {
+ /* See if we can find an AF_INET addr for the AF_INET6 socket instead: */
+ for (rp = result[host_idx]; rp != NULL; rp = rp->ai_next) {
+ if (rp->ai_family == AF_INET)
+ break;
}
- memcpy(addrs_buf + offset, rp->ai_addr, rp->ai_addrlen);
- offset += rp->ai_addrlen;
- break;
}
if (!rp) { /* No addr could be bound for this host! */
LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "No suitable remote address found for host: %s\n",
hosts[host_idx]);
return -ENODEV;
}
+ if (offset + rp->ai_addrlen > addrs_buf_len) {
+ LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "Output buffer to small: %zu\n",
+ addrs_buf_len);
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ }
+ memcpy(addrs_buf + offset, rp->ai_addr, rp->ai_addrlen);
+ offset += rp->ai_addrlen;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -827,15 +863,13 @@
struct addrinfo *res_loc[OSMO_SOCK_MAX_ADDRS], *res_rem[OSMO_SOCK_MAX_ADDRS];
int sfd = -1, rc, on = 1;
unsigned int i;
- bool loc_has_v4addr, rem_has_v4addr;
- bool loc_has_v6addr, rem_has_v6addr;
+ bool loc_has_v4addr = false, loc_has_v6addr = false;
+ bool rem_has_v4addr = false, rem_has_v6addr = false;
+ bool loc_has_v4only_addr, rem_has_v4only_addr;
+ bool loc_has_v6only_addr, rem_has_v6only_addr;
struct sockaddr_in6 addrs_buf[OSMO_SOCK_MAX_ADDRS];
char strbuf[512];
- /* updated later in case of AF_UNSPEC */
- loc_has_v4addr = rem_has_v4addr = (family == AF_INET);
- loc_has_v6addr = rem_has_v6addr = (family == AF_INET6);
-
/* TODO: So far this function is only aimed for SCTP, but could be
reused in the future for other protocols with multi-addr support */
if (proto != IPPROTO_SCTP)
@@ -862,10 +896,17 @@
local_hosts_cnt, local_port, true);
if (rc < 0)
return -EINVAL;
- /* Figure out if there's any IPV4 or IPv6 addr in the set */
- if (family == AF_UNSPEC)
- addrinfo_has_v4v6addr((const struct addrinfo **)res_loc, local_hosts_cnt,
- &loc_has_v4addr, &loc_has_v6addr);
+ /* Figure out if there's any IPv4 or IPv6 entry in the result set */
+ addrinfo_has_v4v6addr((const struct addrinfo **)res_loc, local_hosts_cnt,
+ &loc_has_v4addr, &loc_has_v6addr);
+ /* Figure out if there's any IPv4-only or IPv6-only addr in the result set */
+ addrinfo_has_v4v6only_addr((const struct addrinfo **)res_loc, local_hosts_cnt,
+ &loc_has_v4only_addr, &loc_has_v6only_addr);
+ if (family == AF_INET && loc_has_v6only_addr) {
+ LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "Cannot bind an IPv6 address to an AF_INET socket\n");
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto ret_freeaddrinfo;
+ }
}
/* figure out remote side of socket */
if (flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_CONNECT) {
@@ -875,26 +916,44 @@
rc = -EINVAL;
goto ret_freeaddrinfo_loc;
}
- /* Figure out if there's any IPv4 or IPv6 addr in the set */
- if (family == AF_UNSPEC)
- addrinfo_has_v4v6addr((const struct addrinfo **)res_rem, remote_hosts_cnt,
- &rem_has_v4addr, &rem_has_v6addr);
+ /* Figure out if there's any IPv4 or IPv6 entry in the result set */
+ addrinfo_has_v4v6addr((const struct addrinfo **)res_rem, remote_hosts_cnt,
+ &rem_has_v4addr, &rem_has_v6addr);
+ /* Figure out if there's any IPv4-only or IPv6-only addr in the result set */
+ addrinfo_has_v4v6only_addr((const struct addrinfo **)res_rem, remote_hosts_cnt,
+ &rem_has_v4only_addr, &rem_has_v6only_addr);
+ if (family == AF_INET && rem_has_v6only_addr) {
+ LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "Cannot connect to an IPv6 address in an AF_INET socket\n");
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto ret_freeaddrinfo;
+ }
}
- if (((flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND) && (flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_CONNECT)) &&
- !addrinfo_has_in6addr_any((const struct addrinfo **)res_loc, local_hosts_cnt) &&
+ /* Find out the socket family now if not established by caller:
+ * Both are checked here through "or" here to account for "bind flag set,
+ * connect flag not set" and viceversa. */
+ if (family == AF_UNSPEC) {
+ if (!loc_has_v6addr && !rem_has_v6addr)
+ family = AF_INET;
+ else
+ family = AF_INET6;
+ }
+
+ /* if both sets are used, make sure there's at least 1 address of the
+ * same type on each set so that SCTP INIT/INIT-ACK can work. */
+ if (family == AF_INET6 && ((flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND) && (flags & OSMO_SOCK_F_CONNECT)) &&
(loc_has_v4addr != rem_has_v4addr || loc_has_v6addr != rem_has_v6addr)) {
- LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "Invalid v4 vs v6 in local vs remote addresses: "
- "local:%s%s remote:%s%s\n",
- loc_has_v4addr ? " v4" : "", loc_has_v6addr ? " v6" : "",
- rem_has_v4addr ? " v4" : "", rem_has_v6addr ? " v6" : ""
- );
- rc = -EINVAL;
- goto ret_freeaddrinfo;
+ if (!addrinfo_has_in6addr_any((const struct addrinfo **)res_loc, local_hosts_cnt)) {
+ LOGP(DLGLOBAL, LOGL_ERROR, "Invalid v4 vs v6 in local vs remote addresses: "
+ "local:%s%s remote:%s%s\n",
+ loc_has_v4addr ? " v4" : "", loc_has_v6addr ? " v6" : "",
+ rem_has_v4addr ? " v4" : "", rem_has_v6addr ? " v6" : "");
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto ret_freeaddrinfo;
+ }
}
- sfd = socket_helper_multiaddr(loc_has_v6addr ? AF_INET6 : AF_INET,
- type, proto, flags);
+ sfd = socket_helper_multiaddr(family, type, proto, flags);
if (sfd < 0) {
rc = sfd;
goto ret_freeaddrinfo;
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35232?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2641fbaca6f477404b094dbc53c0c1a3dd3fd2fd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35232
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: merged
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35233?usp=email )
Change subject: socket: osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr2(): Apply params too if no OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND flag set
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35233?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ia32510e8db1de0cc0dc36cebf8a94f09e44fda70
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35233
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:39:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: laforge, pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35232?usp=email )
Change subject: socket: Reimplement osmo_sock_init2_multiaddr()
......................................................................
Patch Set 3: Code-Review+2
(3 comments)
Patchset:
PS3:
re-applying previous 1+1 after comment fix
File src/core/socket.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35232/comment/7a4070cf_38760574
PS2, Line 933: * Both are checked here through "or" here to account for "bind flag set,
> I'm talking about OSMO_SOCK_F_BIND or OSMO_SOCK_F_CONNECT flags here. […]
Ack, now it makes sense.
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35232/comment/9e98c74d_f0bf49fc
PS2, Line 945: (loc_has_v4addr != rem_has_v4addr || loc_has_v6addr != rem_has_v6addr)) {
> I thought about it, but in the end writing it this way is the easiest way of writing it, instead of […]
Okay
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35232?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2641fbaca6f477404b094dbc53c0c1a3dd3fd2fd
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35232
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Reviewer: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:38:21 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: osmith.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239?usp=email )
Change subject: contrib/jenkins: set boost libdir for armv8l
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File contrib/jenkins.sh:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239/comment/44ef05a0_29f6b251
PS1, Line 83: CONFIG_LIBUSRP=""
> it is needed for a new builder, which isn't a rpi: https://osmocom.org/issues/5873 […]
Yeah but that's my point, it would be great to at least understand why it works on armv7l and not in armv8l. Why is libusrp looking for boost on another place? Maybe libusrp needs fixing instead?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I982c13d64415c181b33f89bc145994b9e6aa1a1d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35239
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:33:12 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: laforge, neels.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35179?usp=email )
Change subject: socket: Introduce API osmo_sock_multiaddr_get_ip_and_port()
......................................................................
Patch Set 3:
This change is ready for review.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35179?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I19d560ab4aadec18a4c0f94115675ec1d7ab14d7
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35179
Gerrit-PatchSet: 3
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: neels <nhofmeyr(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:30:40 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
osmith has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239?usp=email )
Change subject: contrib/jenkins: set boost libdir for armv8l
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(1 comment)
File contrib/jenkins.sh:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239/comment/40a73817_0eee2fab
PS1, Line 83: CONFIG_LIBUSRP=""
> Now the yet unanswered question: Why is this needed here now?
it is needed for a new builder, which isn't a rpi: https://osmocom.org/issues/5873
the rpis have $(arch) = armv7l, and there the error does not happen (because of the way the boost autotools stuff works, I assume)
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I982c13d64415c181b33f89bc145994b9e6aa1a1d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35239
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:30:22 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: osmith.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239?usp=email )
Change subject: contrib/jenkins: set boost libdir for armv8l
......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(2 comments)
Patchset:
PS1:
Now
File contrib/jenkins.sh:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239/comment/8253839d_11fea988
PS1, Line 83: CONFIG_LIBUSRP=""
Now the yet unanswered question: Why is this needed here now?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-trx/+/35239?usp=email
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-trx
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I982c13d64415c181b33f89bc145994b9e6aa1a1d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 35239
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-CC: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: osmith <osmith(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 13:27:40 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Gerrit-MessageType: comment