Attention is currently required from: pespin.
daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30930 )
Change subject: Move extern declarations of tall_sgsn_ctx to sgsn.h
......................................................................
Patch Set 1: Code-Review+1
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30930
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ifbd54b2e92db8d4a0e0cd1c569cfd83dd85165b8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30930
Gerrit-PatchSet: 1
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:04:23 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: daniel, lynxis lazus.
pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30890 )
Change subject: gtp_{ggsn,mme}: Allocate contexts under struct sgsn_instance
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
File src/sgsn/gtp_ggsn.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30890/comment/9cd1cf09_4d297f10
PS2, Line 87: struct sgsn_instance *sgsn
> I am wondering how this function worked before you added the sgsn pointer? […]
yes, sgsn is actually a global variable too. I plan to perhaps submit an extra commit at the end renaming it to g_sgsn.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30890
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie65d59632a368c6957c33dca64e856ace792b2c6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30890
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:59:42 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin, daniel, lynxis lazus.
fixeria has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30890 )
Change subject: gtp_{ggsn,mme}: Allocate contexts under struct sgsn_instance
......................................................................
Patch Set 2: Code-Review+2
(1 comment)
File src/sgsn/gtp_ggsn.c:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30890/comment/307d7ad8_faf4c971
PS2, Line 87: struct sgsn_instance *sgsn
I am wondering how this function worked before you added the sgsn pointer?
I guess there is the global sgsn instance defined somewhere?
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-sgsn/+/30890
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: osmo-sgsn
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: Ie65d59632a368c6957c33dca64e856ace792b2c6
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30890
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: fixeria <vyanitskiy(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Gerrit-CC: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: lynxis lazus <lynxis(a)fe80.eu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:53:39 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: Yes
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
dexter has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30724 )
Change subject: gsm_08_58: add IEI to signal HR GSM RTP format via RSL
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Patchset:
PS2:
> I'd like to hear feedback from others here, since I don't think the current proposal in the patch is […]
Just for info: The ultimate goal here is to be able to configure in which of the two HR GSM formats (RFC5993 or TS 101.318) the BTS should use for sending RTP packets. Some core networks prefer the one, some the other format. I don't think that this is a dynamic parameter. From my experience its a fixed property of the core network but I have the feeling that TS 101.318 is the more common format.
I think things would become much easier if we would be able to configure osmo-bts to use one or the other format. At the moment it is sort of random and depends on the phy/trx. even osmo-bts-trx and osmo-bts-sysmo use different formats which has lead to confusion in the past.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30724
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I843c8a0cbe5898311f3af3294cec7c8bc96c4eb8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30724
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:31:29 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Attention is currently required from: pespin.
dexter has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30724 )
Change subject: gsm_08_58: add IEI to signal HR GSM RTP format via RSL
......................................................................
Patch Set 2:
(1 comment)
Commit Message:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30724/comment/c444704e_b4efa7a9
PS2, Line 12: packets. (In the receiving direction the BTS automatically detects the
> If the BTS automatically detects the RTP format upon rx, why cannot we simply detect it automaticall […]
1: The MGW does exactly that but it has no knowledge about when to convert and when not. It just converts one format into the other and vice versa. It works fine for homogenic setups but once you add a BTS that uses the other format it won't work.
2: in MGCP/SDP There is no specified way to signal which HR GSM format to use and it would also address the problem at the wrong location. The BTS should transit in the expected format and we shouldn't be forced to convert it at some second-tier point.
We can solve the problem via osmo-bts.cfg. I personally would prefer that solution since it is much simpler, but I thought we would prefer to have the BTS parameters configured by the BSC.
--
To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/30724
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings
Gerrit-Project: libosmocore
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I843c8a0cbe5898311f3af3294cec7c8bc96c4eb8
Gerrit-Change-Number: 30724
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Owner: dexter <pmaier(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder
Gerrit-Reviewer: msuraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 09:17:02 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment