Attention is currently required from: arehbein, laforge, pespin. daniel has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35079?usp=email ) Change subject: osmo_io: Remove union in struct osmo_io_ops ...................................................................... Patch Set 4: (1 comment) Patchset: PS4: I disagree that we should put the burden of this onto the user. It's an easy enough mistake to make. This is complicated by the fact that the only way to set (either initially or later) the callback function is by passing in a struct osmo_iofd_ops *. This means that with the union there is *no* way at all to detect this. ``` osmo_iofd_setup(iofd, ..., mode, &ops); // Checking ops callbacks according to mode doesn't work osmo_iofd_set_ioops(iofd, &ops); // Same as above, we have iofd->mode, but ops is ambiguous ``` Maybe you're thinking of osmo_stream_* where we have *_set_read_cb() etc. functions? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/35079?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: I138d57843edc29000530bb7896bcb239002ecbec Gerrit-Change-Number: 35079 Gerrit-PatchSet: 4 Gerrit-Owner: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-CC: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: arehbein <arehbein(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge(a)osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 15:22:26 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> Comment-In-Reply-To: daniel <dwillmann(a)sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment