The reason this is something people want is that the UE in bridge mode can
offer a public IP to a router behind the UE. I do agree that this is likely
something very proprietary. A proxy-ARP would be good but I am not sure how
that would work in the UE.
David Peterson
Senior Engineer
855-947-7776 ext. 9214
c 419-706-7355
d 979-314-1305
https://www.ispsupplies.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2020 2:52 PM
To: david(a)ispsupplies.com
Cc: nextepc(a)lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: Bridged APN
Hi David,
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 06:18:23PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:29:21PM -0400, david(a)ispsupplies.com wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with a bridged
APN on Open5GS?
As far as I know, 3GPP didn't really introduce "Ethernet" type PDN
contexts until very recent releases. For a long time, IPv4, IPv6 and
IPv4v6 were the only available options.
I just checked: Etehernet type PDN connections are only supported in 5G, but
not in 4G/EPC. Even Releae 15 doesn't mention it at all.
So whatever some vendors may be offering, I would bet it is not really any
actual Ethernet bridging. It may be more something like proxy-ARP on the
PGW side, but still only passing IP over the 4G network.
The big question is: What is it used for, and what are the requirements of
that use case? A real Ethernet bridge would be transparent regarding the
MAC addresses on both sides. And that's what I'm stating is not possible
over 4G as per 3GPP specs.
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2flaforge.gnumonks.org%2f&…
=E,1,hNWtGbT4z6FpXSVPyJKcFjf3Z0KiFEs8jM-ieaMX3jUKxhJL6VV9DcaPN5fdRSrnNaVHR5G
hVAve_eYEICjye1bCYOfis2a5-vfq2X4NJZr6S8viUCbMA4Q5bg,,&typo=1
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)