11 Feb
2022
11 Feb
'22
11:06 a.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org>
Sent: piątek, 11 lutego 2022 10:12
To: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik(a)linux.intel.com>
Cc: netdev(a)vger.kernel.org; michal.swiatkowski(a)linux.intel.com; Drewek, Wojciech
<wojciech.drewek(a)intel.com>om>;
davem(a)davemloft.net; kuba(a)kernel.org; pablo(a)netfilter.org;
osmocom-net-gprs(a)lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/5] gtp: Allow to create GTP device without FDs
Hi Harald,
Thanks for triggering CI.
Do I see correctly that results for our changes are the same as for master?
Regards,
Wojtek
Hi Marcin,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:04:01PM +0100, Marcin Szycik wrote:
On 05-Feb-22 17:34, Harald Welte wrote:
Thanks, I've triggered a build, let's hope it works out. Results should
be at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/
and detailed logs at
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/conso…
The same testsuite executed against master can be seen at
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-latest-torva…
[the high amount of test cases failing is due to the lack of IPv6 support in the kernel
GTP].
Let's hope your forked repo renders identical test results to upstream!
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6) Hi Marcin, Wojciech,
thanks for the revised patch. In general it looks fine to me.
Do you have a public git tree with your patchset applied? I'm asking as
we do have automatic testing in place at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/ where I
just need to specify a remote git repo andit will build this kernel and
run the test suite.
I've created a public fork with our patchset applied, please see [1].