Hi.
14.01.19 16:55, Keith пишет:
Yes, it's publicly archived too, but there is at
least no implicit
agreement that it's OK to scrape the openBSC archive and use it to train
your AI, although I imagine google are doing that anyway.
Actually, there is: by the very definition of "public" - BND, Google (or
me :) are complete free to scrape, train AI on or print the messages and
make origami out of them. Using gmail adds absolutely nothing new to the
picture.
I've done quite a lot of research on silicon
valley and corporate
surveillance companies, and Google specifically.
So does FSF I believe. Yet, GNU Hurd, GCC and numerous other projects
have participated in GSoC for many years without any issues. They even
came up with guidelines about it:
https://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/guidelines.html
Don't take it personally, but I'd rather side with
gnu.org on this one :)
If developer X is working on FOSS just to get paid,
and does not care
about the ethics, they are possibly in the wrong job
I don't think we're in position to judge if FOSS developers are "in the
wrong job" based on ethics disagreements.
I'll say it once more; google
is not your friend.
Nobody claimed otherwise. You're preaching to the choir :)
--
- Max Suraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de>
http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Harald Welte