On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 09:18:25PM +0100, Daniel Willmann wrote:
you're right. I was trying to first record the
status quo so you can see
the behaviour changes as the issue is fixed.
Holger was quite fond of this in the recent lapdm fixes, but it probably
makes less sense here. Holger, any preferences how I should handle this?
Move the test to the end, have a failing test, ..?
The question is if you want to have a known issue in new code or not. What
is the impact for the end-user/NITB? How will this fail? Is this a step
backward compared to the extensions by BSD/Linux?
holger