[M] Change in osmo-hnbgw[master]: immediately SCCP RLSD on HNB re-register

Attention is currently required from: neels, laforge.

pespin has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915 )

Change subject: immediately SCCP RLSD on HNB re-register ......................................................................

Patch Set 2: Code-Review+1

(3 comments)

Patchset:

PS1:

ST_DISCONNECTED means we received a RUA Disconnect message. […]

Ok, but I think you didn't mention the RUA_Disconnect message there, now it's clearer.

Patchset:

PS2: I'm fine with having the name changes in another commit.

File src/osmo-hnbgw/context_map_sccp.c:

https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-hnbgw/+/32915/comment/e839d8ca_6451be04 PS1, Line 362: tx_sccp_df1(fi, ranap_msg); : tx_sccp_rlsd(fi);

I understand the "tx" as "send down the user SAP", not necessarily transmit on a wire. […]

I think "dispatch" or "submit" are better candidates than "transmit" or "send" when passing stuff accross layers. Even "send_down" would be better than transmit.