5 Feb
2022
5 Feb
'22
9:57 p.m.
Hi all!
[please follow-up-to the openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org mailing list, if
there is any discussion, we don't want to drag it over tons of mailing
lists in parallel]
Some weeks ago, I created https://osmocom.org/issues/5397 but it seems nobody
noticed the ticket or had any comments to it.
So let me post this as RFC here on the mailing list:
In the past, we had a gitolite/gitosis setup, which was fine in the
early days of git, but it means that people cannot easily create new
repositories, see who has permissions, and we cannot delegate ownership.
Even updating SSH keys requires manual interaction of a sysadmin like
me.
I would therefore suggest to migrate git.osmocom.org to gitea[1]
This would allow the following features:
* users can self-create any number of personal repositories (like gitlab/github)
* we can create 'organizations' along the line of reasonably independent
osmocom member projects like op25, who can then manage their own
repos/permissions/...
* gitea can link to redmine wiki and redmine issue trackers (rather than
using its own built-in)
For those repositories hosted in gerrit (mainly CNI), we would still
keep git.osmocom.org a read-only mirror, like we do it right now.
For those repositories not hosted in gerrit, users/projects could then
accept merge requests in gitea. Coupling this with 3rd party
authentication via github/gitlab/etc should make it easier for the
occasional contributor to submit changes.
There is a downside, of course; A lot of repo URLs have to change. Most
of our current repositories are at git.osmocom.org/project.git while
gitea follows a git.osmocom.org/organization/project.git scheme. I'm not
sure there is any way to help to mitigate this...
Any thoughts, comments?
[1] https://gitea.io/
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
7 Feb
7 Feb
12:05 a.m.
Hi Harald, everyone,
Unfortunately I haven't had the opportunity to actively work on anything
osmocom for quite a while now, however I think I can contribute a few ยข
on this one.
I have been using Gitea for about a year now, and I am generally very
happy with it. It even includes some collaborative features, like
project boards (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/8346). It has a
few annoying bugs or issues, like #17808 when creating new pages in the
wiki (https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/17808), or the lack of a
"cancel" button to return while modifying a page.
I have also used the integration of accounts with LDAP, which worked
well, except when I realized that I hadn't created any administrator
account prior to that; but this could be solved with Gitea's own CLI tool.
About the repo URLs, I suppose you could host Gitea at eg
gitea.osmocom.org, and put redirections in place on git.osmocom.org. A
default page with instructions about how to reach Gitea could be
configured there, until enough URL rewriting rules are identified and
put in place.
In the meantime, HTH,
-- khorben
On 05/02/2022 21:57, Harald Welte wrote:
Hi all!
[please follow-up-to the openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org mailing list, if
there is any discussion, we don't want to drag it over tons of mailing
lists in parallel]
Some weeks ago, I created https://osmocom.org/issues/5397 but it seems nobody
noticed the ticket or had any comments to it.
So let me post this as RFC here on the mailing list:
In the past, we had a gitolite/gitosis setup, which was fine in the
early days of git, but it means that people cannot easily create new
repositories, see who has permissions, and we cannot delegate ownership.
Even updating SSH keys requires manual interaction of a sysadmin like
me.
I would therefore suggest to migrate git.osmocom.org to gitea[1]
This would allow the following features:
* users can self-create any number of personal repositories (like gitlab/github)
* we can create 'organizations' along the line of reasonably independent
osmocom member projects like op25, who can then manage their own
repos/permissions/...
* gitea can link to redmine wiki and redmine issue trackers (rather than
using its own built-in)
For those repositories hosted in gerrit (mainly CNI), we would still
keep git.osmocom.org a read-only mirror, like we do it right now.
For those repositories not hosted in gerrit, users/projects could then
accept merge requests in gitea. Coupling this with 3rd party
authentication via github/gitlab/etc should make it easier for the
occasional contributor to submit changes.
There is a downside, of course; A lot of repo URLs have to change. Most
of our current repositories are at git.osmocom.org/project.git while
gitea follows a git.osmocom.org/organization/project.git scheme. I'm not
sure there is any way to help to mitigate this...
Any thoughts, comments?
[1] https://gitea.io/
--
khorben
9:35 a.m.
Hi,
which use would you like to give to gitea exactly? For wiki/tickets we
have redmine already, and for submission (code review) we do have
gerrit. What are you suggesting exactly? Simply have a readonly gitea
instance to navigate instead of cgit? Or replace redmine + gerrit with
gitea?
I'd personally oppose to replace redmine + gerrit to gitea, specially
for the code review part.
--
- Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
9:53 a.m.
Hi again,
I now realize this is a thread started in several mailing lists by
Harald, so it seems I was missing the context with my previous email.
After reading Harald's email, it seems it's about adding gitea while
still keeping the gerrit+redmine. So I'm fine with, I don't mind it that
way.
--
- Pau Espin Pedrol <pespin(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
31 Mar
31 Mar
5:35 p.m.
New subject: migration of git.osmocom.org to gitea?
Dear Osmocom community,
[please follow-up-to the openbsc(a)lists.osmocom.org mailing list, if
there is any discussion, we don't want to drag it over tons of mailing
lists in parallel]
Back in February I was posting a related RFC, and now the migration is
complete, at least for all externally visible aspects relevant to users
and developers.
I've tried to make it as backwards-compatible as possible, meaning that;
* we do have https://gitea.osmocom.org/ by now
* gitea is the primary system for all non-gerrit repositories
(mostly projects outside the cellular network infrastructure), see
e.g. https://gitea.osmocom.org/phone-side/osmo-qcdiag
* gitea is a secondary/mirror for all gerrit hosted repositories
(mostly projects within the cellular network infrastructure). Those
repositories are marked as mirros with an icon next to the repository
name, see e.g. https://gitea.osmocom.org/osmocom/libosmocore
* https://cgit.osmocom.org/ renders the old cgit user interface for time to come
* https://git.osmocom.org/ main page redirects to gitea
* per-project https://git.osmocom.org/libosmocore redirects to the right
gitea URL for each project (by means of a series of about 200 nginx
rewrite rules). This also means that cloning from old https URLs
remains working
* cloning from the git:// URLs also remains working
* deep links to individual commits, or to the /patch URL as used in our
Dockerfiles for cache invalidation on source code change remain valid
So this means that all existing links, search engines, read-only clones,
etc. will continue to work for those repositories that were still
created in the pre-gitea time.
However, for developers with commit/push access to non-gerrit
repositories, there are some changes:
1) you will neeed to create an account on https://gitea.osmocom.org/
- and register your SSH public key[s] there. Unfortunately due to a
bug in redmine we cannot yet use the redmine OpenID provider, so
you need to create a separate account. If you're missing permissions
for certain respositories, please contact me by private mail or
create an issue in https://osmocom.org/projects/osmocom-servers
2) you will need to change the git+ssh push URLs if you want to push
to repositories *not* hosted on gerrit. I've attached a CSV file
for the old vs. new URLs to https://osmocom.org/attachments/5148.
You can change the URL in your .git/config files manually, or you can
use the 'git remote set-url' command to do that.
If something is not working as expected, please let me know. The main
ticket for the gitea migration is https://osmocom.org/issues/5397
Regards,
Harald
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)osmocom.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
765
days inactive
819
days old
baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org
4 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Harald Welte -
Pau Espin Pedrol -
Pierre Pronchery