7 Mar
2014
7 Mar
'14
8:44 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:27:38PM +0100, ☎ wrote:
Dear Max,
Commented.
That was not the point. I tried to ask you what you intend to test. E.g.
if you take a look at Jacob's range encoding tests in OpenBSC. There is a
simple list of fixes values that are tested and then some random numbers.
Now I find your testcase very hard to comprehend. This is why I want to
understand the goal first and then propose a more simple/straight forward
approach. But now I did propose something. ;)
You are still having
for (...) but we have for (...) {
{
sorry about that. But we still have some time until Sunday. :)
I'll add more comments to clarify - in general, I
do not see better approach for
serialize/deserialize kind of functions than trying to read/write and compare the
results.
Max, what do you want to test?