24 Jun
2010
24 Jun
'10
7:45 a.m.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:39:09PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
For the RACH_CONF, from the code, I see that it already contains the frame number at which the RACH was sent. (in the l1ctl_info_dl header of the CONF message, the frame_nr field is set)
yes, this is how I intended it to be used. -- - Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)