Re: [PATCH] Add A5/3 and 4 support

16.06.2014 23:24, Sylvain Munaut пишет:

Why the _ prefix ? It's exported and in the header and none of the other have it. Unnecessary inconsistency.

Agree but I would rather hide implementation details of all osmo_a5_* from public API completely into separate non-installable header. Generic osmo_a5 should be fine for all use cases. Are there any reasons we expose those? -- best regards, Max, http://fairwaves.co