Hi Harald,
Am Di, 28.04.2009, 18:31, schrieb Harald Welte:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:07:44PM +0200, Dieter Spaar
wrote:
We could
add this setting to the bs11_config program so people can try
if
their E1 clock or their [10 years uncalibrated]
BS11 internal
oscillator is
better.
I did a quick test with this setting and it seems to work fine
with the BS-11 (so we should not believe the documentation ;-).
Here is the LMT dump for the PLL Mode, it can be changed during
normal operation:
; Locked
Tx D0A5070000FC0102
Rx D1A5070000FC0102
; Standalone
Tx D0A5070000FC0103
Rx D1A5070000FC0103
I have created a patch for bs11_config to emit those two messages. It's
attached to this mail, but I haven't had time to test it yet.
However, since it doesn't change any common code paths, I have committed
it.
It would be great if somebody could do some testing if this actually
works.
Not yet:
openbsc:/studienarbeit/svn/trunk/openbsc# bs11_config pll-e1-locked
bs11_config (C) 2009 by Harald Welte and Dieter Spaar
This is FREE SOFTWARE with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
LMT LOGON: ACK
PHASE: 2 Maintenance MBCCU0: Load MBCCU1: Load
Abis-link: Down
Segmentation fault
It dies at:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
abis_nm_bs11_set_pll_locked (bts=0xb7efa018, locked=1) at
../include/openbsc/tlv.h:20
tlv.h:
static inline u_int8_t *tlv_put(u_int8_t *buf, u_int8_t tag, u_int8_t len,
const u_int8_t *val)
{
*buf++ = tag;
*buf++ = len;
memcpy(buf, val, len); <-- Boom
return buf + len;
}
Best Regards,
Holger
--
| Holger Adams <holger(a)kernreaktor.org>
| University of Applied Sciences Esslingen