18 Mar
2016
18 Mar
'16
11:43 a.m.
I disagree - having .service files is a perfect way to make sure that
openbsc by default use .config and hlr files in locations supplied by
the package. Also it helps to improve security of the setup by using
options like /"PrivateTmp", "/InaccessibleDirectories/",
"/ReadOnlyDirectories/" etc.
/On a related note - if there were some changes made to /debian
directories while packaging it probably make sense to merge them back to
upstream.
Thanks for great work.
//////
On 03/18/2016 11:34 AM, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 06:53:37PM +0100, Ruben
Undheim wrote:
--
Max Suraev <msuraev(a)sysmocom.de> http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Directors: Holger Freyther, Harald Welte
Hi,
It might interest you that OpenBSC has entered Debian unstable today!
https://tracker.debian.org/news/755641
Nice! Thanks, Ruben!!
Please test the package and file bugs as you find
them. I haven't added init/service files
yet to the package, since it needs some careful thought around what default is the best
for the general users.
I agree. Also, the binaries by default typically look in ./
for config
files, not using /etc/osmocom/ or something. Makes sense to me to not have
service files.
~Neels