7 Oct
2009
7 Oct
'09
8:26 a.m.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 01:08:47PM +0200, Philipp Hug
wrote:
the problem is, that at least on my nanoBTS, the most recently activated
software was not the correct one and I had to manually activate the correct
one.
the question is: which is the 'correct' one? this is a choice only the
administrator can take, based on his information of which versions are
installed in the BTS, and his information on what differentiates those software
versions.
To summarize: I think it is good if we simply document the fact that we will
activate the default software, and that it is the users responsibility to ensure
the default software will work.
What we should do, though, is to create a list of known-working ip.access
firmware versions on the wiki.
Regards,
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
So maybe we need hard-code which software to prefer
for activation or we
put some warnings in the wiki.
why? If you say we are activating the most recently activated software,
why is there a need for a warning of any sort? Or why would we need to
hardcode?