8 Mar
2014
8 Mar
'14
7:50 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
<holger(a)freyther.de> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 04:53:12PM +0100, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
I don't see any immediate needs for having created timestamps, but I
agree that it's a good idea to keep it. The updated patch is attached
and the branch is updated.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. / ООО УмРадио
https://fairwaves.co
- "(datetime('now'), %u,
"
+ "(%s, %s, "
...
- validity_timestamp,
+ received_timestamp, validity_timestamp,
Please do not change the created to be the received timestamp. If you
want to have a received_timestamp then introduce it. In case you hurry
up we can get it into schema version 4.