20 Mar
2014
20 Mar
'14
9 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:34:00PM +0100, pablo@gnumonks.org wrote:
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@gnumonks.org>
This field needs to be in network byte order as well. --- The problem only shows up if you use sgsn and ggsn with different endianess. If no objections, I'll push this to master.
Oh? Did you have a set-up where this actually happened? What do you think about having macros to "write" and "read" the tid/imsi/nsapi?