On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone heard of a nanoBTS without EFR support ?
I think it is extremely unlikely, as all nanoBTS have been built long after EFR was introduced. I could imagine them not supporting AMR, but even that seems unlikely.
I have one here that responds with BIND_NACK if the codec is EFR but works ok if I set V1
meybe it's related to the RTP PAYLOAD TYPE IE or something like that... -- - Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)