1 Oct
2009
1 Oct
'09
4:14 a.m.
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 14:49:21 Harald Welte wrote:
Hi Zecke,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 01:37:42PM +0200, Holger Freyther wrote:
Okay, I have added a change set, please check if you are okay with it.
holger
On Wednesday 30 September 2009 13:23:10 Harald
Welte wrote:
I think LAC = 0xfffe seems to be the way to go for paging of all BTS, wile
we keep LAC = 0 for the 'user is detached' case. You are now redefiniing the LAC 0 to something
like the opposite case,
which I don't particularly like. Is there some alternative solution?
I didn't think about the IMSI DETACH case. One easy alternative is to use
the other reserved lac value. With the least significant bit set 0 and
all others to 1 (so 0xfffe... ETSI always makes me unsure about it).