Hi Holger, Sorry for repeat replies.
I just came across this smalltalk implementation you have done for some
other elements such as a MSC, HRL, etc., Would that be any use for what im
trying to do here with OpenBSC.
Thanks & Rgds
Nik
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Nik Pakar <nikpakar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Holger,
Many thanks for your reply.
Im trying to implement a scalable nanoGSM platform which i can have 100s
of nano.BTSs connecting to multiple OpenBSCs/NITBs. This is where i was
trying below two options.
1. To get the calls routed in/out from and to NITB
2. Unbundle HLR DB to a central mysql db so all NITBs can talk to that
common HLR and possibly a basic central GMSC (sip/mgcp only) can lookup the
HLR and route calls to them accordingly.
But so far i have failed to get this no.1 done using LCR/asterisk option.
So pretty much given up with that.
Thats why trying alternatives now.
Coming back to MGCP, is this mainly to be used in BSC only mode where MSC
server will have SCCP/A with BSC and use MGCP for media ?
Or can a NITB act as a MGCP GW while NITB does full msc/hlr/vlr functions
and use MGCP to send and receive calls to a MGCP_CA ?
Many thanks for all your help. Its a great fantastic job OpenBSC team has
done so far.
Rgds
Nik
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <
holger(a)freyther.de> wrote:
On 03/03/2012 10:17 PM, Nik Pakar wrote:
Dear all, Is this BSC_MGCP is functioning ?
Is that mean Open_BSC can be act as a MGCP gateway and can control from
a
MGCP_CA ?
Hi,
it is a MGCP Gateway and a CA can allocate endpoints. Currently the BSC
and
the MGCP GW share a secret (config setting) of where the BTS is asked to
send
RTP packages too.
holger
PS: Maybe you want to re-introduce yourself to this group and share what
you
plan to do. :)