4 Oct
2009
4 Oct
'09
8:42 p.m.
On Sunday 04 October 2009 13:51:29 Harald Welte wrote:
one further note on the missing md5 file:
As it seems it is only used to generate a pseudo-random 32bit value
for use in the SSRC: I'd rather not introduce a copy of MD5 for that.
There are two options to take:
1) simply use the same [not very random] method as we use for the TMSI
2) introduce a dependency to openssl and use that. Given that nanoBTS
also support OML/RSL over SSL/TLS, I think sooner or later we will
have to add that dependency anyway.
hi,
i think that very good random is not required. in our case we don't have
large scale RTP conferences with thousands of sources. we have to choose
a random number that just differs from the one selected by nanoBTS. (the
RTP session will fail afer some seconds when using same SSRC.)
andreas