On Wednesday 25 November 2009 20:47:28 Harald Welte wrote:
Hi Holger!
I'm currently reviewing changeset 2d501ea26a219176b1c556449e45ebd90d4accfb
and just noticed that you introduce a new 'int rf_locked' member to struct
gsm_bts_trx, which I believe is not needed.
We are already tracking the administrative state of all objects in the BTS
and mirror their state.
The specific state you are looking for should be in
gsm_bts_trx.nm_state.administrative
I would appreciate if you could fix this.
I will, honestly I was just too lazy to figure out if the state is updated, how
it should be set on startup. I will try to fix it before FOSS.IN.
z.