On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:40:10AM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
Hi Alexander and others,
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Alexander Chemeris wrote:
phys_chan_config TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH
I personally prefer this option, because it doesn't leave a place for
doubt.
I also think it should be kept this way for consistency with other pchan
names.
Agreed.
I thought, maybe we want to add more pchan types so having a shorter DYN name
could be useful. But having a consistent, explicit, logical name is better.
From a VTY syntax POV, the '/' are ugly in the
name
Yeah, especially since it looks like "TCH or F_TCH or H_PDCH" :)
But one gets used to it quickly.
~Neels