16 Mar
2014
16 Mar
'14
12:14 p.m.
Hi Holger,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther
<holger(a)freyther.de> wrote:
E.g. in one
of the testcases I noticed that you don't use C99 initializers but the
old/error prone way of initializing. :)
Yes, I think in this particular case the old way is more compact and
thus more readable.
I added C99 initializers to the test (see the patch attached or
achemeris/sms-fixes branch) and to me it looks less readable and thus
more error prone. If you see any benefits of this patch - feel free to
merge it, though.
--
Regards,
Alexander Chemeris.
CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. / ООО УмРадио
https://fairwaves.co