16 Mar
2014
16 Mar
'14
11:14 a.m.
Hi Holger, On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther <holger@freyther.de> wrote:
E.g. in one of the testcases I noticed that you don't use C99 initializers but the old/error prone way of initializing. :)
Yes, I think in this particular case the old way is more compact and thus more readable. I added C99 initializers to the test (see the patch attached or achemeris/sms-fixes branch) and to me it looks less readable and thus more error prone. If you see any benefits of this patch - feel free to merge it, though. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. CEO, Fairwaves, Inc. / ООО УмРадио https://fairwaves.co