10 Sep
2013
10 Sep
'13
12:06 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:07:32AM +0200, Jacob Erlbeck wrote:
/* return parent node */ -/* MUST eventually converge on CONFIG_NODE */ +/* + * MUST eventually converge either on CONFIG_NODE for every config node or + * on CONFIG_ENABLE for every other user defined node. + */
The comment is wrong. There is no CONFIG_ENABLE node but the comment sounds dangerous too. The ENABLE_NODE might be password protected and I would like to avoid a situation where we come from a 'child' of the VIEW_NODE and end in 'ENABLE_NODE'.