Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 02:11:49PM +0200, Andreas
Eversberg wrote:
+ lc = &trx->ts[0].lchan[4].lapdm_ch;
+ if (!lc) {
how can this ever be null?
lc was a return vale from a function before, but you are right. this
check is now obsolete, so i removed it.
thanx!