10 Apr
2011
10 Apr
'11
4:51 p.m.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 01:50:27PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On 08/04/11 14:06, Harald Welte wrote:
sure, go ahead! also, it might be good to check regarding the tetra dissector
status, I have the feeling nobody has reviewed it so far...
--
- Harald Welte <laforge(a)gnumonks.org> http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
(ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Hi Pablo,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:05:08PM +0200, pablo(a)gnumonks.org wrote:
Should I submit it to wireshark? From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
<pablo(a)gnumonks.org>
This patch removes the C99 structure initialization which is not allowed
by the wireshark project (since it has to compile with non-C99 compliant
compilers).
Thanks, I've applied it to the tree, it's not on the public git yet, as
I'm currently offline at a legal conference.