30 Jan
2019
30 Jan
'19
1:47 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:25:08PM +0000, Holger Freyther wrote:
The state works pretty nicely if you don't kill -9 the process :P
The thought to build another safeguard around it has come up a few times
before.
yet we probably wouldn't be talking about it if jenkins didn't maintain that
habit of just kicking open the airlock to void space on the osmo-gsm-tester.
(OTOH of course it would be even nicer if we could deal with kill -9 safely as
well, but where do you draw the line; there's always *some* place where a kill
-9 breaks the plan.)
~N
On 28. Jan 2019, at 20:30, Pau Espin Pedrol
<pespin(a)sysmocom.de> wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I don't know how the state works but have you considered:
* Adding stale detection, either in code or jenkins?
* far fetched.. look if subreaper can be of any help?