laforge has submitted this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmo-sigtran/+/43217?usp=email )
(
1 is the latest approved patch-set. No files were changed between the latest approved patch-set and the submitted one. )Change subject: xua_snm.c: Use M3UA IE define when shared with SUA IE ......................................................................
xua_snm.c: Use M3UA IE define when shared with SUA IE
We use everywhere the M3UA IE define when both the M3UA and SUA IE are equivalent (for those IEs the SUA define points to the M3UA, and osmo_static_assert() are placed at the start of the file).
Change-Id: Ie15e5a179b65afc7a0d1cbe145cce4cf2556c877 --- M src/xua_snm.c 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Approvals: laforge: Looks good to me, approved Jenkins Builder: Verified
diff --git a/src/xua_snm.c b/src/xua_snm.c index a2e4fde..2abc42e 100644 --- a/src/xua_snm.c +++ b/src/xua_snm.c @@ -552,8 +552,8 @@ /* an incoming SUA/M3UA DUPU was received from a remote SG */ void xua_snm_rx_dupu(struct osmo_ss7_asp *asp, struct osmo_ss7_as *as, struct xua_msg *xua) { - uint32_t aff_pc = xua_msg_get_u32(xua, SUA_IEI_AFFECTED_PC); - const char *info_str = xua_msg_get_str(xua, SUA_IEI_INFO_STRING); + uint32_t aff_pc = xua_msg_get_u32(xua, M3UA_IEI_AFFECTED_PC); + const char *info_str = xua_msg_get_str(xua, M3UA_IEI_INFO_STRING); /* TODO: should our processing depend on the RCTX included? I somehow don't think so */ //struct xua_msg_part *ie_rctx = xua_msg_find_tag(xua, SUA_IEI_ROUTE_CTX); int log_ss = osmo_ss7_asp_get_log_subsys(asp);