Attention is currently required from: daniel, laforge, pespin. arehbein has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720?usp=email ) Change subject: gsmtap: Hide implementation of gsmtap_inst ...................................................................... Patch Set 2: (1 comment) File include/osmocom/core/gsmtap_util.h: https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720/comment/5164a842_f5a40261 PS2, Line 30:
I think it may be a good idea to add the new symbol as gsmtap_inst_fd2() and change the known client […] Instead of adding `gsmtap_inst_fd2()`, I could also just keep using `wq.bfd.fd` through the `wq` member of `struct gsm_inst` for Osmo IO, only acessing it through `gsmtap_inst_fd()` even internally. That should work, because Osmo IO will replace usage of the write queue altogether.
And if by 'changing the internal structure', you meant getting rid of the `wq` struct member altogether and adding, say a member `int fd` internally, that can also easily be done then later. And we avoid adding an additional API function. Any objections to that? -- To view, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/libosmocore/+/34720?usp=email To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.osmocom.org/settings Gerrit-Project: libosmocore Gerrit-Branch: master Gerrit-Change-Id: Ibe1a51205a6df764571b6d074e365825555609a5 Gerrit-Change-Number: 34720 Gerrit-PatchSet: 2 Gerrit-Owner: arehbein <arehbein@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: Jenkins Builder Gerrit-Reviewer: daniel <dwillmann@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Reviewer: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Reviewer: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: laforge <laforge@osmocom.org> Gerrit-Attention: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Attention: daniel <dwillmann@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2023 13:27:05 +0000 Gerrit-HasComments: Yes Gerrit-Has-Labels: No Comment-In-Reply-To: pespin <pespin@sysmocom.de> Gerrit-MessageType: comment