Attention is currently required from: laforge, fixeria.
dexter has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/32995 )
Change subject: RLCMAC_CSN1_Types: Add release 6 additions to PacketCellChangeNotification ......................................................................
Patch Set 1:
(3 comments)
Patchset:
PS1: Please have a critical look at the CSN.1 description and my implementation as TTCN3 record. For the Matrioshka I found examples to orient myself on but for the escape bit mechanism (arfcn, bsic, utran_target_cell) I couldn't find any example. Also variable length field reporting_quantity in UtranCCNMesurementReport was a bit challenging.
File library/RLCMAC_CSN1_Templates.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/32995/comment/753109b4_7dd27... PS1, Line 166: utran_target_cell_presence := omit, I am bit surprised that non present optional fields must not be unbound. Shouldn't TTCN3 know by the variant/PRESENCE description know if the field is there or not?
File library/RLCMAC_CSN1_Types.ttcn:
https://gerrit.osmocom.org/c/osmo-ttcn3-hacks/+/32995/comment/14136ecb_6726e... PS1, Line 1030: variant (utran_target_cell) "PRESENCE(arfcn_bsic_presence = '1'B, utran_target_cell_presence = '0'B)" This describes the escape bit mechanism:
0 arfcn, bsic 10 utran_target_cell 110 (4G extensions, to be added later)