Please let me know if this email format patch worked ok. I have a few more
patches that I'm waiting to send.
B.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Bhaskar11 <niceguy108(a)gmail.com> wrote:
From d1ad22fa60e9d52bac246391b2fb6de57fb067b7 Mon Sep
17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bhaskar <niceguy108(a)gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:08:02 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] * Bugfix in Firmware: initialising variables
Under specific circumstances, these variables would have been used without
initialisation.
---
src/target/firmware/apps/loader/main.c | 2 +-
src/target/firmware/layer1/mframe_sched.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/target/firmware/apps/loader/main.c
b/src/target/firmware/apps/loader/main.c
index 8bdbc74..c74c045 100644
--- a/src/target/firmware/apps/loader/main.c
+++ b/src/target/firmware/apps/loader/main.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static void cmd_handler(uint8_t dlci, struct msgb *msg)
uint8_t command = msgb_pull_u8(msg);
- int res;
+ int res = 0;
flash_lock_t lock;
diff --git a/src/target/firmware/layer1/mframe_sched.c
b/src/target/firmware/layer1/mframe_sched.c
index f3a6b43..047d709 100644
--- a/src/target/firmware/layer1/mframe_sched.c
+++ b/src/target/firmware/layer1/mframe_sched.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static const struct mframe_sched_item
*sched_set_for_task[32] = {
/* encodes a channel number according to 08.58 Chapter 9.3.1 */
uint8_t mframe_task2chan_nr(enum mframe_task mft, uint8_t ts)
{
- uint8_t cbits;
+ uint8_t cbits = 0;
switch (mft) {
case MF_TASK_BCCH_NORM:
--
1.7.9