The last changes in the airprobe svn seem to be 17 months ago. I was wondering whether airprobe is assumed to be stable, without need for further development, has been superseded by a different toolkit or if it has been abandonded.
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Philip Peter <philip.peter@gmx.de> wrote:
The last changes in the airprobe svn seem to be 17 months ago. I was wondering whether airprobe is assumed to be stable, without need for further development, has been superseded by a different toolkit or if it has been abandonded.
pretty much abandonded Cheers, Sylvain
Am 24.10.2012 15:39, schrieb Sylvain Munaut:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Philip Peter <philip.peter@gmx.de> wrote:
The last changes in the airprobe svn seem to be 17 months ago. I was wondering whether airprobe is assumed to be stable, without need for further development, has been superseded by a different toolkit or if it has been abandonded. pretty much abandonded
Has any replacement emerged? I want to do some security analysis, especially on the paging requests and the "random access" and "access grant" channels. I would now start working on implementing uplink sniffing into airprobe, but if there are more current alternatives, that would be welcome. Bye, Philip
So in other words: if one would start to snif on gsm traffic, you would suggest a c123 instead of an ettus usrp? ----- Oorspronkelijk e-mail ----- Van: "Sylvain Munaut" <246tnt@gmail.com> Aan: "Philip Peter" <philip.peter@gmx.de> Cc: baseband-devel@lists.osmocom.org Verzonden: Woensdag 24 oktober 2012 16:18:28 Onderwerp: Re: Is airprobe still being developed? Hi,
pretty much abandonded
Has any replacement emerged?
Not that I know of ... it's been on my TODO list for ... so long ... Everyone I know uses C123 for GSM sniffing, just easier and the demo algo works so much better than airprobe's ... Cheers, Sylvain
participants (3)
-
g.roelant＠telenet.be -
Philip Peter -
Sylvain Munaut