This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Keith keith at rhizomatica.orgOn 11/09/2017 22:28, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > > up on all of those. There's a lot in there... > https://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/2017-February/010312.html Hi Neels! Yes, there's a lot in there, I have to admit TL;skipped through the middle once it started getting into a complexity that is beyond my experience, there I trust you.. you know what you're doing. :) In the last section, re logging level all everything. Maybe it should be called logging level all passthrough, or logging level all respect or somesuch. > > I would welcome a comprehensive approach of defining all use cases we want to > support (like temporary reduction of everything to 'notice' level, and then > going back to the precise landscape of fine tuned logging that was in place > before that...) What I think one needs most to avoid is having to type logging level subsystem level for EVERY subsystem, although, as I mentioned at osmocon, I have written up some expect scripts to open VTYs and do this. If logging level all notice were to function as a filter that respects individual subsystem levels, that would be workable. > So if anyone would like to compile an overview, maybe write a wiki page... that > would be nice. What do you think of allowing logging level all everything for the moment?