weekly test report (w5 2017)

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Neels Hofmeyr nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de
Wed Feb 8 15:26:11 UTC 2017


(found this mail stuck in my outbox, sending late)

On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote:
> Hi Harald,
> 
> I see. What was communicated to me was that NITB channel configuration
> TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH is not supported with nanoBTS.
> 
> I will have in mind that nanoBTS does not support HR (v1) codec.

Yes, we discussed TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH for the nanoBTS. I remember to be surprised
because from some discussion it appeared that the nanoBTS supports HR, and I
was expecting TCH/F only.

While talking about codecs, the ip.access nanoBTS *should* in fact support the
TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots. Ivaylo, could you check whether that is part of
your testing procedure and add it if not?

~N


-- 
- Neels Hofmeyr <nhofmeyr at sysmocom.de>          http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschäftsführer / Managing Directors: Harald Welte
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20170208/5dfdfaff/attachment.bin>


More information about the OpenBSC mailing list