weekly test report (w5 2017)

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Ivaylo Kostov ikostov at sysmocom.de
Mon Feb 6 09:09:23 UTC 2017


Hi Harald,

I see. What was communicated to me was that NITB channel configuration 
TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH is not supported with nanoBTS.

I will have in mind that nanoBTS does not support HR (v1) codec.

Thank you.

Regards,
Ivaylo

On 03.02.2017 20:14, Harald Welte wrote:
> Hi Ivaylo,
>
> thanks for your test report.
>
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 05:00:03PM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote:
>
>> During a weekly test of nanoBTS model:165G, an issue has been discovered. It
>> is reported in redmine: https://osmocom.org/issues/1933
>>
>> Short description: It was found that the initiated voice call drops
>> immediately after B subscriber accepts the call, when nanoBTS (model 165G)
>> and NITB is configured with dynamic channels: 3 TCH/H and 3 PDCH. Default
>> voice codec tch-h hr has been selected.
>
> Why is there again an attempt to use HR (v1) with the nanoBTS?  It is a
> codec that this BTS hardware is known to never have supported.  I am
> quite sure this has been discussed before.  Was there some
> miscommunication / mis-definition of the test cases?
>
> Regards,
> 	Harald
>

-- 
------------------------------
- Ivaylo Kostov <ikostov at sysmocom.de> <mailto:ikostov at sysmocom.de> 
     http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
------------------------------




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list