weekly test report (w5 2017)

This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.

A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.

Ivaylo Kostov ikostov at sysmocom.de
Wed Feb 8 15:33:26 UTC 2017


Hi Neels,

Yes.  I do have TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots in the test procedure.

regards,
Ivaylo

On 08.02.2017 16:26, Neels Hofmeyr wrote:
> (found this mail stuck in my outbox, sending late)
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:09:23AM +0100, Ivaylo Kostov wrote:
>> Hi Harald,
>>
>> I see. What was communicated to me was that NITB channel configuration
>> TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH is not supported with nanoBTS.
>>
>> I will have in mind that nanoBTS does not support HR (v1) codec.
>
> Yes, we discussed TCH/F_TCH/H_PDCH for the nanoBTS. I remember to be surprised
> because from some discussion it appeared that the nanoBTS supports HR, and I
> was expecting TCH/F only.
>
> While talking about codecs, the ip.access nanoBTS *should* in fact support the
> TCH/F_PDCH dynamic timeslots. Ivaylo, could you check whether that is part of
> your testing procedure and add it if not?
>
> ~N
>
>-- 
------------------------------
- Ivaylo Kostov <ikostov at sysmocom.de> <mailto:ikostov at sysmocom.de> 
     http://www.sysmocom.de/
=======================================================================
* sysmocom - systems for mobile communications GmbH
* Alt-Moabit 93
* 10559 Berlin, Germany
* Sitz / Registered office: Berlin, HRB 134158 B
* Geschaeftsfuehrer / Managing Director: Harald Welte
------------------------------




More information about the OpenBSC mailing list