This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Holger Hans Peter Freyther holger at freyther.deOn Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 02:32:57PM +0100, Daniel Willmann wrote: > I'm not opposed, but I don't see how it would help anything. I doubt > that whoever forgot to check the function signature will remember to > compare the length against a define. Maybe it is time for gerrit or at least a set-up for patchwork. I had a look at your branch and stopped at the first commit message. :) "Before this patch we just loop over the fd with read returning -1.." ==> looped (past tense)? "EINTR is handled to not cause an error and because the socket is not opened with O_NONBLOCK we don't need to check EAGAIN/EWOULDBLOCK." I don't think it is true. osmo_fd_register will enable O_NONBLOCK on the socket and I think we use that to register the fd. the actual fixes look nice though. :)