This is merely a historical archive of years 2008-2021, before the migration to mailman3.
A maintained and still updated list archive can be found at https://lists.osmocom.org/hyperkitty/list/OpenBSC@lists.osmocom.org/.
Tom Tsou tom at tsou.ccOn Jan 9, 2014 3:26 PM, "Kurtis Heimerl" <kheimerl at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > With the RAD1, the system is beaconing correctly. However, phones are unable to camp. I logged a phone trying to camp on both the RAD1 and a B100 to compare the output and see if anything jumps out. The osmoBTS/osmo-nitb logs are seemingly identical, but the transceiver outputs are different. By beaconing correctly, you mean the handset recognize the network? Based on these logs, you're not receiving RACH bursts. Both of the transceiver outputs are attached. The only big difference I see is in the "underflows" on the RAD1, which in my experience is a deal-breaker; that's not usually an easy fix. This is unrelated to osmo-bts. The effect on performance will depend on the frequency of occurrence. -TT -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/openbsc/attachments/20140110/8366a533/attachment.htm>